首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Tumor marker determination after orthotopic heart transplantation.
Authors:H N?gele  M Bahlo  R Klapdor  W R?diger
Affiliation:1. Department of Medicine, JIPMER, Puducherry, India;2. Department of Pulmonary Medicine, JIPMER, Puducherry, India;3. Department of Biochemistry, JIPMER, Puducherry, India;1. Department of pathology, Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.;2. Department of Clinical and Experimental Research, Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.;3. Department of cardiology, Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.;4. Department of cardiac surgery, Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.;1. University of Campinas, Department of Organic Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, Rua Josué de Castro s/n, Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, CP 6154, Campinas, São Paulo 13081-970, Brazil;2. University of Campinas, Chemical, Biological and Agricultural Pluridisciplinary Research Center, CPQBA, Rua Alexandre Cazelatto, 999, Vila Betel, Paulínia, São Paulo 13148-218, Brazil;3. University of Campinas, Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Campinas, São Paulo 13081-970, Brazil;4. University of Campinas, Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Campinas, São Paulo 13081-970, Brazil;1. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440-112 Street, Edmonton T6G 2B7, Alberta, Canada;2. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada;3. Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada;4. National "111″ Center for Cellular Regulation and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Key Laboratory of Fermentation Engineering, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China;5. Tianyou Hospital, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China;1. Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;2. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;3. Department of Pediatrics, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;4. Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Because the risk of developing malignant tumors after heart transplantation is approximately 100-fold higher, methods for rapid diagnosis must be developed to allow early and aggressive treatment in these patients. Although tumor markers have been used frequently for surveying already detected cancer, we studied their value in screening for tumors in heart transplant patients. METHODS: The levels of the tumor markers CEA, CA19-9, CA125, CA72-4, TPA, TPS, and CYFRA 21-1 were determined prospectively in 3-month intervals in 91 heart transplant patients between 1993 and 1998. RESULTS: In eight patients a definite diagnosis of cancer was made during the marker survey (mean observation time 2.85 +/- 1.3 years), including bronchogenic carcinoma in six, renal carcinoma in one, and colon cancer in one. All patients with bronchogenic carcinoma were smokers. The markers had a sensitivity below 60% to detect cancer. Given a 2-fold cutoff level (10 ng/mL), the CEA was the only marker with sufficient specificity (93.8%, only one false-positive result). Two patients were symptom-free even though they had elevated CEA levels. In one of those patients, disseminated intractable cancer was diagnosed at first evaluation, whereas no tumor was found in the other case at first evaluation. Subsequently, by means of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, a hypermetabolic region was found in the right upper mediastinum. Control computed tomographic scan 4 weeks after the first investigation showed disseminated intractable disease also in this patient. Another heart transplant patient with colon cancer showed a normalization of the CEA after hemicolectomy and an increase in the CEA when liver dissemination developed. There was a relationship between cardiac death and CA125 and TPS in some heart transplant patients. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the CEA is the only tumor marker with adequate sensitivity and specificity to detect subclinical malignancies in the follow-up of heart transplant patients. However, because of several limitations (limited diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities and enormous costs), we cannot recommend screening by tumor markers on a regular basis. Because of the elevated risk of cancer in patients who had organ transplantation, further prophylactic measures, especially smoking cessation programs, must be developed. Once a malignancy is diagnosed, tumor markers can help target clinical decisions. Additionally, nonspecific increases in CA125 and TPS levels might be related to nonmalignant circulatory disturbances and cardiac death.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号