穴位贴敷治疗恶性肿瘤晚期终末阶段症状的临床观察

目的：观察并了解穴位贴敷改善恶性肿瘤晚期终末阶段患者的生存质量。方法：收集2015年9月—2016年11月舒缓疗护病区恶性肿瘤晚期终末阶段患者100例，分成治疗组50例，采用常规药物联合穴位贴敷治疗；对照组50例，采用常规药物治疗。用生存质量量表（QOL）评估两组患者治疗1、3、5 d时的生存质量。结果：治疗组治疗1、3、5 d时的QOL评分分别为（27.96±4.87）分、（25.84±5.34）分和（35.44±9.26）分，对照组分别为（23.86±5.1）分、（25.84±5.34）分和（28.42±7.4）分。两组治疗1 d时的QOL评分差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），但治疗3 d和7 d时，治疗组的QOL评分优于对照组，组间差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01）。结论：采用常规药物联合穴位贴敷治疗恶性肿瘤晚期终末阶段患者疗效较好，能提高患者的生存质量。

Clinical observation of acupoint sticking therapy for symptoms of the advanced terminal stage of malignant tumor

Objective:To observe and understand the acupoint sticking to improve the quality of life in the patients with advanced terminal stage of malignant tumor. Methods:From Sept. 2015 to Nov. 2016, 100 patients with advanced terminal stage of malignant tumor in the palliative care ward were collected and divided into a treatment group with 50 cases who were treated with the conventional medicine combined with acupoint sticking therapy and a control group with 50 cases who were treated with the conventional medicine. The quality life scale(QOL) was used to assess the quality life of the two groups at the time of treatment after 1, 3 and 5 days.Results:The scores of the quality life scale were27.96±4.87, 25.84±5.34 and 35.44±9.26 in the treatment group and 25.84±5.34, 25.84±5.34 and 28.42±7.4 in the control group after 1, 3, 5 days of treatment, respectively. There was no signiifcant difference in QOL scores between the two groups after 1 day of treatment(P>0.05). However, the QOL scores of the treatment group were better than those of the control group after 3 and 7 days of treatment and the difference was statistically signiifcant(P<0.01).Conclusion:The use of conventional drugs combined with acupoint sticking therapy in patients with advanced terminal stage of malignant tumor can achieve good results and improve the quality of life of the patients.