首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

亲属供肾单支动脉与多支动脉的临床疗效比较
引用本文:王宣传,鲁继东,戎瑞明,许明,唐群业,孙立安,朱同玉.亲属供肾单支动脉与多支动脉的临床疗效比较[J].复旦学报(医学版),2010,37(6):697-699.
作者姓名:王宣传  鲁继东  戎瑞明  许明  唐群业  孙立安  朱同玉
作者单位:复旦大学附属中山医院泌尿外科 上海市器官移植重点实验室,上海200032
基金项目:上海市科学技术委员会医学重点项目,国家自然科学基金项目
摘    要: 目的 探讨亲属供肾单支血管与多支血管在肾移植临床疗效上有无差异。方法 采用回顾性分析方法统计130例亲属肾移植受体病史资料,采用基本统计方法计算供体肾动脉、静脉变异的发生率,并对受体进行1~5年随访,采用χ2检验比较多支供肾动脉与单支供肾动脉疗效有无差异。结果 供体术前CT血管成像检查(CT angiography,CTA)评估结果发现,32例供体出现副肾动脉,发生率为24.6%,其中双肾副肾动脉10例,发生率为7.7%;肾静脉多支15例,发生率为11.5%,且均为右肾。受体和供肾的1年存活率分别为94.3%和91.5%。单支动脉供肾与多支动脉供肾在肾移植中的临床疗效无明显差异。结论 亲属供肾单支血管与多支血管在肾移植中的临床疗效无差异,且对供体和受体均安全。

关 键 词:亲属肾移植  CT血管成像检查  多支肾动脉  单支动脉
收稿时间:2010-1-12

Comparative study on clinical efficacy of living related renal transplantation with multiple renal arteries and single renal artery
WANG Xuan-chuan,LU ji-dong,RONG Rui-ming,XU Ming,TANG Qun-ye,SUN Li-an,ZHU Tong-yu.Comparative study on clinical efficacy of living related renal transplantation with multiple renal arteries and single renal artery[J].Fudan University Journal of Medical Sciences,2010,37(6):697-699.
Authors:WANG Xuan-chuan  LU ji-dong  RONG Rui-ming  XU Ming  TANG Qun-ye  SUN Li-an  ZHU Tong-yu
Institution:Shanghai Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation-Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
Abstract:Objective To compare clinical efficacy of living related renal transplantation with single renal artery and multiple renal arteries. Methods One hundred and thirty cases of renal transplantation performed in Zhongshan Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Their demographic information was summarized by basic statistical method. All recipients were followed up for one year to five years. χ2 test was used to compare clinical efficacy between single and multiple renal arteries. Results Donors were assessed by CT angiography (CTA) before surgery. Accessory renal artery was found in 32 donors (24.6%), while 10 cases were bilateral (7.7%). Multiple veins in right kidney were found in 15 donors (11.5%). The post-transplantation one-year survival rates of patients and grafts were 94.3% and 91.5%, respectively. In this study, there was no statistical difference in clinical efficacy between single renal artery group and multiple renal arteries group. Conclusions There was no statistical difference in clinical efficacy between living related renal transplantation with single renal artery and multiple renal arteries. The use of these grafts was safe for both recipient and donor.
Keywords:living related renal transplantation  CT angiography  multiple renal arteries  single renal artery
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《复旦学报(医学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《复旦学报(医学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号