全阻断（隔）胃癌根治术与传统胃癌根治术的比较

 目的 介绍胃癌全阻断（隔）根治术技术要点及操作规范,并在手术时间、手术费用及术后并发症等方面与传统胃癌根治术比较。方法 选择符合入组标准的胃癌患者30例，随机分为两组：A组行全阻断（隔）胃癌根治术，B组行传统胃癌根治术。分析比较肿瘤部位、完成阻断所需时间、胃肠重建方式比例、手术时间、完成阻断所需耗材费用、术后病理TNM分期、住院时间、术后并发症及术后化疗方案。结果 A组除手术时间长于B组外（P<0.05），两组间其余比较指标均无显著统计学差异。结论 胃癌全阻断（隔）技术可在术中较完全阻隔肿瘤，操作简便，费用低廉，阻断后基本不影响其后的手术操作，术后并发症发生率和住院时间与传统手术无显著统计学差异。

Comparison of complete-block radical gastrectomy and traditional radical gastrectomy

Objective To introduce the techniques and specification of complete-block radical gastrectomy,and to compare with traditional radical gastrectomy in the operative time,surgical costs and postoperative complications. Methods Thirty gastric cancer patients meet the criteria were randomly divided into 2 groups.Group A: complete-block radical gastrectomy;group B: radical gastrectomy.Analysis and comparison were made on tumor site,time consuming of block,the proportion of gastrointestinal reconstruction,operativ...