首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

良性前列腺增生患者对中文版国际前列腺症状评分理解能力的调查
引用本文:邰胜,梁朝朝,叶元平,刑江湜,刘明,张贤生,郝宗耀,周骏,樊松,蒋云仙,王克孝. 良性前列腺增生患者对中文版国际前列腺症状评分理解能力的调查[J]. 安徽医学, 2009, 30(1): 9-12. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2009.01.009
作者姓名:邰胜  梁朝朝  叶元平  刑江湜  刘明  张贤生  郝宗耀  周骏  樊松  蒋云仙  王克孝
作者单位:230022,合肥,安徽医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科;230022,合肥,安徽医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科;230022,合肥,安徽医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科;230022,合肥,安徽医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科;230022,合肥,安徽医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科;230022,合肥,安徽医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科;230022,合肥,安徽医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科;230022,合肥,安徽医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科;230022,合肥,安徽医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科;230022,合肥,安徽医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科;230022,合肥,安徽医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科
摘    要:目的了解不同文化背景条件下的良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者对中文版国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)理解能力的准确性。方法自2008年9月至10月间,对我院门诊及病房104例BPH患者进行中文版IPSS问卷调查,患者的年龄是58.90±15.41岁。分别按照其文化层次分为文盲组32例,年龄53.94±18.03岁,小学组23例,年龄61.87±15.15岁,中学组27例,年龄60.93±13.84岁,大学组22例,年龄60.55±12.31岁。首先,在门诊的候诊厅中让BPH的患者根据自己对调查表的理解力自评。然后,有一位泌尿外科医生对其每项条款进行解释,再结合患者的情况及病史做出评价,住院病人在病房调查方法同上。分析两种评分间结果的差异性。结果文盲组中第4项评分在两种评分间差异有显著性意义(P〈0.05),但总分数在两种评分间比较的P=0.050。小学组中各项及总分数在两种评分之间差异无显著性意义(P〉0.05)。中学组及大学组中各项评分及总分数在两种评分之间差异无显著性意义(P〉0.05)。结论不同文化背景下患者对中文版IPSS的理解力同医生间差异无统计学意义,且文化层次越高理解的准确性越高。

关 键 词:良性前列腺增生  国际前列腺症状评分  差异性

Men with the benign prostatic hyperplasia understanding about the Chinese International Prostate Symptoms Scores from a cross-sectional survey
Tai Sheng,Liang Chaozhao,Ye Yuanping,et al. Men with the benign prostatic hyperplasia understanding about the Chinese International Prostate Symptoms Scores from a cross-sectional survey[J]. Anhui Medical Journal, 2009, 30(1): 9-12. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2009.01.009
Authors:Tai Sheng  Liang Chaozhao  Ye Yuanping  et al
Affiliation:Tai Sheng,Liang Chaozhao,Ye Yuanping,et al Department of Urology,First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University,Hefei 230032
Abstract:Objective To investigate accuracy of understanding about the Chinese-International Prostate Symptoms Scores (IPSS) among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) ranking culture. Methods A total of 104 outpatients and hospital patients (58.90± 15.41) with BPH have administrated the questionnaire of Chinese-IPSS from September to October in 2008, ranked as illiterate 32 (53.94± 18.03), elementary school 23 (61.87±15.15), high school 27 (60.93±13.84) and university group 22 (60.55±12.31) individuals, respectively. Firstly, patients administered the questionnaire by themselves. Furthermore, the urologist explanation each item,base on patients' severity and history. Then, other special results were collected. In hospital, the same measurement was utilized. Finally, we analyzed the difference between them. Results In illiterate group there was significant difference between the two methods in the fourthscore (P<0.05), however, the sum scores was no obvious difference (P=0.05). There were no significant differences in each and all items between them in primary school group(P>0.05). Meanwhile, there were no obvious differences in each item and sum score in the other 2 groups(P>0.05). Conclusion The patients with different educational levels understanding about CHINESE-IPSS were no significant differences; furthermore, the higher educational level was the exacter understanding.
Keywords:Benign prostate hyperplasia  International prostate symptoms scores  Difference  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号