首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

上颌窦底内提升术同期种植窦内成骨的临床效果
引用本文:王倩,李丹,唐志辉.上颌窦底内提升术同期种植窦内成骨的临床效果[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2019,51(5):925-930.
作者姓名:王倩  李丹  唐志辉
作者单位:北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,牙周科 国家口腔疾病临床研究中心 口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程试验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,北京100081;北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,第二门诊部 国家口腔疾病临床研究中心 口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程试验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,北京100081
基金项目:首都临床特色应用研究与成果推广项目(Z161100000516229)
摘    要:目的:回顾性评价上颌窦底内提升术在植骨与不植骨的情况下同期植入种植体后上颌窦内成骨的效果。方法:共纳入上颌后牙区缺牙的患者26例,根据术式不同分为上颌窦底内提升+植骨组(A组)和上颌窦底内提升+不植骨组(B组), 同期进行种植,术后30~50个月常规复查随访,观察上颌窦内成骨情况。结果:共植入了27枚种植体(其中A组13枚,B组14枚), 随访时间为40.23(36.20,48.07)个月。A组上颌窦底剩余骨高度(residual bone height, RBH)为(6.64±1.21) mm,B组RBH为(6.96±1.36) mm,二者差异没有统计学意义(P = 0.459)。A组随访时上颌窦内成骨高度(sinus bone gain, SBG)为(2.20±1.71) mm,B组随访时SBG为1.77(0.94, 2.05) mm,二者差异没有统计学意义(P = 0.583)。根据随访时种植体尖端附近成骨情况将种植体尖端成骨分为3类,分别为优、良和中。随访时A组有9枚种植体尖端成骨质量为优和良,B组有8枚种植体尖端成骨质量为优和良,二者差异没有统计学意义((Fisher精确检验,P = 0.695)。A组种植体尖端位于新上颌窦底下方(0.09±1.32) mm,B组种植体尖端位于新上颌窦底下方(0.03±0.91) mm,二者差异没有统计学意义(P = 0.898)。随访时两组总体的SBG为1.85(1.10, 2.20) mm,将两组随访时的SBG分别与多个因素进行相关分析,发现其仅与种植体尖端突出于上颌窦底的高度显著相关(r=0.383, P = 0.049)。结论:上颌窦底内提升术在植骨与不植骨的情况下都能取得较好的效果,SBG主要与种植体尖端提升的高度显著相关。

关 键 词:上颌窦底提升术  种植体  窦内成骨高度
收稿时间:2017-10-09

Sinus floor elevation and simultaneous dental implantation: A long term retrospective study of sinus bone gain
Qian WANG,Dan LI,Zhi-hui TANG.Sinus floor elevation and simultaneous dental implantation: A long term retrospective study of sinus bone gain[J].Journal of Peking University:Health Sciences,2019,51(5):925-930.
Authors:Qian WANG  Dan LI  Zhi-hui TANG
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the sinus bone gains after sinus floor elevation procedures with or without grafts when implants were placed simultaneously. Methods: The research included 26 edentulous patients in the maxillary posterior region, who were divided into 2 different groups according to the sinus lift procedures employed: group of osteotome sinus floor elevation with bone grafts (group A) and group of osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone grafts (group B). The implants were placed simultaneously, and were followed for a period of 30-50 months after sinus floor elevation as routine and then were observed for sinus bone change. Results: There were 27 implants (13 implants for group A and 14 implants for group B)and the following time was 40.23(36.20, 48.07) months. The residual bone height (RBH) was (6.64±1.21) mm for group A and ( 6.96±1.36) mm for group B; the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.459).The sinus bone gain (SBG) when followed was (2.20±1.71) mm for group A, and 1.77(0.94, 2.05) mm for group B; the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.583). The quality of apical bone around implant apex was divided into 3 categories which were excellent, fine and fair.The quality of apical bone around implant apex was excellent and fine for 9 implants in group A and 8 implants in group B, and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant((Fisher exact test,P = 0.695).The implant apex when followed was (0.09±1.32) mm below the new sinus floor for group A and(0.03±0.91) mm for group B, and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant(P = 0.898). The SBG for the total was 1.85(1.10, 2.20) mm. The SBG was statistically significantly only related to the protrusion height of the implant apex (r=0.383, P = 0.049). Conclusion: Sinus floor elevation procedures with or without grafts can all gain good results. The SBG is related to the protrusion height of the implant apex significantly.
Keywords:Sinus floor elevation  Dental implants  Sinus bone gain  
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《北京大学学报(医学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京大学学报(医学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号