首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

2012年度铜陵市公共场所环境卫生调查
引用本文:王耀晖,戴悦,邱申伟,刘聚矩.2012年度铜陵市公共场所环境卫生调查[J].职业与健康,2014(8):1096-1098.
作者姓名:王耀晖  戴悦  邱申伟  刘聚矩
作者单位:安徽省铜陵市疾病预防控制中心,244000
摘    要:目的了解铜陵市大中型公共场所室内空气环境卫生质量状况,为卫生监督管理提供依据。方法按照公共场所卫生标准(GB9663—1996至GB9673—1996、GB16153—1996)中规定的相关项目进行现场测定,足浴场所依据上海市地方标准《足浴服务卫生要求》(DB31359—2006)进行,依照《公共场所卫生综合评价方法》(WS/T199—2001)对室内空气环境进行综合评价。结果监测9类292户次公共场所室内空气环境,监测项目总项次为2214项次,合格总项次为1888项次,总合格率为85.3%。其中公共浴室合格率为51.8%。各类别公共场所监测项目总项次合格率差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。经过综合评价,292户次中达I级户次占32.2%,II级户次占60.6%,111级户次占7.2%,1V级户次为0,不同类别公共场所I级、Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级分别所占比例差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。结论铜陵市公共场所室内空气环境卫生状况总体情况良好,今后须进一步加强公共场所卫生监督监测和卫生管理工作,尤其是对公共浴室的监督监测管理,全面提高公共场所的卫生质量。

关 键 词:公共场所  环境卫生  现场监测

Investigation on environmental hygiene of public places in Tongling City in 2012
WANG Yao-hui,DAI Yue,QIU Shen-wei,LIU Ju-ju.Investigation on environmental hygiene of public places in Tongling City in 2012[J].Occupation and Health,2014(8):1096-1098.
Authors:WANG Yao-hui  DAI Yue  QIU Shen-wei  LIU Ju-ju
Institution:( Tongling Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Anhui, 244000, China)
Abstract: Objective] To investigate the environmental hygiene of indoor air in large and medium-sized public places in Tongling City, provide the basis for hygienic supervision and management. Methods] The field measurement was conducted referring to the national hygienic standard for public place ( GB9663-1996 to GB9673-1996, and GB16153-1996). The standard for foot massage places was based on Shanghai local standard of Hygienic Requirements for Foot Massage Service { DB 31359-2006) , while the envi- ronmental hygiene of indoor air was evaluated according to the Comprehensive Assessment on Hygienic Quality of Public Places ( WS/T199-2001 }. Results ] 292 public places of 9 categories were investigated for the environmental hygiene of indoor air, a total of 2214 items were tested, and 1888 were qualified with the overall qualified rate of 85.3%. The qualified rate of public bathroom was 51.8%. There was significant difference in the overall qualified rate of surveillance items among different categories of public places (P 〈0.01). According to the comprehensive evaluation, 32.2% of the public places were assessed as gradeⅠ , 60.6% was grade Ⅱ , and 7.2% was grade Ⅲ. There was no public place of grade IV. The differences in proportion of grade Ⅰ , Ⅱ and Ⅲ among different categories of public places were statistically significant ( P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion] The overall quality of environ- mental hygiene in public places in Tongling City is good. It is necessary to further strengthen the hygienic supervision and manage- ment in public places, especially the public bathroom, to improve the hygienic quality of public places.
Keywords:Public place Environmental hygiene Field monitoring
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号