首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

基于问题学习与授课式学习教学模式对我国脑血管病学临床教学效果的meta分析
引用本文:蒙世佼,卓滋泽,许蓉,任依.基于问题学习与授课式学习教学模式对我国脑血管病学临床教学效果的meta分析[J].中国卒中杂志,2021,16(8):864-872.
作者姓名:蒙世佼  卓滋泽  许蓉  任依
作者单位:1北京 100070首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院教育处,国家神经系统疾病临床医学研究中心2国家癌症中心,国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心,中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院=办公室
基金项目:首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院“苗圃工程”(2017MP10)首都医科大学教育教学改革研究课题(2020JYJX159)
摘    要:目的 系统评价基于问题学习(problem-based learning,PBL)和传统的授课式学习(lecture-based learning,LBL)教学模式在我国脑血管病学临床教学中的应用效果.方法 检索中文数据库(中国期刊全文数据库、万方数据知识服务平台、维普资讯中文期刊服务平台)中关于脑血管病临床教学应用P...

关 键 词:基于问题学习  授课式学习  脑血管病  教学  荟萃分析
收稿时间:2021-06-16

Meta Analysis on Efficacy Comparison between Problem-Based Learning and Lecture-Based Learning inCerebrovascular Disease Clinical Teaching in China
MENG Shi-Jiao,ZHUO Zi-Ze,XU Rong,REN Yi.Meta Analysis on Efficacy Comparison between Problem-Based Learning and Lecture-Based Learning inCerebrovascular Disease Clinical Teaching in China[J].Chinese Journal of Stroke,2021,16(8):864-872.
Authors:MENG Shi-Jiao  ZHUO Zi-Ze  XU Rong  REN Yi
Abstract:Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy of problem-based learning (PBL) and traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) in cerebrovascular disease clinical teaching in China. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PBL and LBL in cerebrovascular disease clinical teaching were retrieved from Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, VIP Information Chinese Journal Service Platform) from inception to May 2021. Revman 5.4 and Stata 15.0 were used for meta analysis and publicationbias detection. By using standard mean difference (SMD) or RR and 95%CI , the teaching efficacy
Keywords:Problem-based learning  Lecture-based learning  Cerebrovascular disease  Clinical teaching  Meta analysis
  
点击此处可从《中国卒中杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国卒中杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号