个体化护理干预对习惯性流产者社会支持水平及负性情感状态的影响

目的 探究个体化护理干预应用于习惯性流产者对其社会支持水平及负性情感状态的影响.方法 选取该科收治的习惯性流产者156例作为研究对象,根据时间的不同分为两组:其中对照组为2015年1~6月期间采取常规护理的习惯性流产者78例;研究组为2015年7~12月期间在对照组基础上引入个体化护理干预后的习惯性流产者78例,两组患者均于来院当天及术后一周接受焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)及社会支持测评.结果 两组干预前的SAS和SDS评分无统计学差异(P>0.05);干预后,研究组SAS和SDS评分均低于对照组(均P<0.05).两组患者于干预前的主观支持、客观支持及社会支持评分无统计学差异(P>0.05);干预后,研究组患者于干预后的主观、客观及社会支持评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 个体化护理干预应用于习惯性流产者,能有效提高其社会支持水平,亦能改善其负性情感状况,值得在临床上进一步推广.

The influence of habitual abortion by the introduction of nursing intervention on the level of social support and negative emotion

Objective To explore the effect of nursing intervention on social support level and negative emotional state of habitual abortion.Methods A total of 156 cases of habitual abortion who were treated in our hospital were divided into study group and control group,with 78 cases in each group according to different time(from January 2015 to June 2015 and from July 2015 to December 2015).The control group were treated with routine nursing intervention,while the study group was treated with nursing intervention on the basis of the control group.Two groups of pregnant women were in the hospital on the same day and one week after surgery to accept the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self rating depression scale (SDS) and social support evaluation.Results There was no significant difference in SAS and SDS scores between the two groups (P>0.05).The SAS and SDS scores in the study group were lower than that of the control group (P<0.05).The subjective support,objective support and social support scores of the two groups were significantly different (P>0.05).The subjective support,objective support and social support score of the study group were higher than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusions Nursing intervention should be used for habitual abortion, it can effectively improve the level of social support and can improve the negative emotional state,it is worth further promotion in clinical.