首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

股骨近端锁定钢板与防旋髓内钉治疗稳定型股骨转子间骨折的疗效分析
引用本文:沈政,余润泽,喻德富,陈涛.股骨近端锁定钢板与防旋髓内钉治疗稳定型股骨转子间骨折的疗效分析[J].创伤外科杂志,2018(1):23-26.
作者姓名:沈政  余润泽  喻德富  陈涛
作者单位:安徽省第二人民医院骨科, 合肥,230041
摘    要:目的比较股骨近端锁定钢板(PFLP)与股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)治疗稳定型(Evans分型1组及Ⅰ型2组)股骨转子间骨折的疗效。方法回顾性分析2014年12月—2017年1月安徽省第二人民医院收治的36例稳定型股骨转子间骨折患者,按手术方法不同分为PFLP组(21例)和PFNA组(15例),记录并比较两组手术时间、出血量、术后恢复时间以及髋关节功能。结果 36例患者均获得随访,时间3~18个月,两组手术时间、术后住院时间差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。两组均获得骨折愈合,PFNA组骨折愈合时间、术后下地负重时间短于PFLP组(10.80±2.93)周vs.(15.14±2.10)周、(5.33±3.24)周vs.(8.38±2.62)周],差异有统计学意义(P0.01),术中出血量PFNA组少于PFLP组(206.67±62.18)m L vs.(296.67±98.96)m L],差异有统计学意义(P0.01)。两组术后3个月髋关节功能评分,优良率均达70%以上,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。两组术后没有严重并发症出现。结论 PFNA与PFLP均是稳定型转子间骨折的优秀内固定选择,但PFNA术中出血较少,术后恢复更快,更适用于稳定股骨转子间骨折。

关 键 词:股骨转子间骨折  钢板  髓内钉  内固定  intertrochanteric  fracture  locking  plate  intramedullary  nail  internal  fixation

Efficacy comparison between proximal femoral nail antirotation and proximal femoral locking plate for stable intertrochanteric fracture
SHEN Zheng,YU Run-ze,YU De-fu,CHENG Tao.Efficacy comparison between proximal femoral nail antirotation and proximal femoral locking plate for stable intertrochanteric fracture[J].Journal of Traumatic Surgery,2018(1):23-26.
Authors:SHEN Zheng  YU Run-ze  YU De-fu  CHENG Tao
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of proximal femoral nail antirotation ( PFNA) and proximal femoral locking plate ( PFLP) in the treatment of stable intertrochanteric fracture ( Evans typeⅠgroup1 and type Ⅰgroup2).Methods Thirty-six patients with stable intertrochanteric fracture in our hospital from Dec .2014 to Jan.2017 were divided into PFNA group(n=15) and PFLP group(n=21) according to different operation meth-ods.The operating time,blood loss,recovery time and hip function after the operation were recorded and compared . Results All the 36 patents were followed up for 3 to 18 months.The average operating time and hospital stay had no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05).The bone union had been achieved in both groups .But the average time of bone union and weight-bearing was shorter in PFNA group than that in PFLP group ,which had statistical differences ( P<0.01) .Also,the amount of intraoperative blood loss was much more in PFLP group than that in PFNA group,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01).The excellent rate of hip function af-ter operation reached above 70%in both groups,which had no statistical difference (P>0.05).No severe compli-cation was observed in either group .Conclusion PFNA and PFLP are excellent internal fixations for stable inter-trochanteric fracture .Because of less blood loss and faster postoperative recovery during operation , PFNA is more suitable for stable intertrochanteric fractures .
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号