肿痛安糊剂与替硝唑碘仿糊剂治疗干槽症疗效比较

目的:比较肿痛安糊剂与替硝唑碘仿糊剂治疗干槽症的效果。方法:临床选择干槽症患者90例,随机分为肿痛安组、替硝唑碘仿糊剂组、对照组,每组各30例,实验组分别采用肿痛安糊剂、替硝唑碘仿糊剂填塞牙槽窝,对照组采用碘仿纱条填塞牙槽窝,比较三种方法的治疗效果。结果:肿痛安糊剂组、替硝唑碘仿糊剂组、对照组治疗干槽症有效率分别为93.3%、96.6%、76.6%,实验组与对照组之间差异有显著性(P<0.05),两实验组之间差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论:肿痛安糊剂与替硝唑碘仿糊剂治疗干槽症的疗效可靠,两者的疗效均明显优于碘仿纱条,值得在临床推广。

Comparison of the effects of zhongtongan paste and tinidazole - iodoform paste for dry socket

Objective:To compare the effects of zhongtongan paste and tinidazole-iodoform paste for dry socket.Methods:We selected90dry socket patiens in clinic,then divided them into three groups:zhongtongan paste group(30),tinidazole-Iodoform paste group(30)and control group(30),then pluged them into teeth socket separately,compared the therapeutic effects of three groups.Results:The effective rates of three groups were93.3%,96.6%,76.6%repectively,there was significant difference between experiment groups and control group(P<0.05),there was no significant difference between experiment groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Zhongtongan paste and tinidazole-iodoformpaste were effective for dry socket,two methods were better than iodoform cotton strip in effect,and were worth extending in clinic.