中国老年医学系统评价/Meta分析的方法学与报告质量评价

目的]评估中国老年医学领域系统评价或者Meta分析的方法学与报告质量,为规范中国老年医学领域同类循证研究提供根据与借鉴。方法]由两位研究者独立检索中国知网(CNKI)、维普中文期刊数据库(VIP)、万方数据库(Wan Fang)和中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)数据库自建库至2016年5月所发表的中国老年医学系统评价或者Meta分析文献,利用AMSTAR量表和PRISMA量表对最终纳入文献进行评价。结果]纳入的193篇文献中,65篇为系统评价,128篇为Meta分析。方法学与报告质量的问题主要表现为检索不全面,偏倚风险评估未得到相应重视,研究中的资助来源未详细说明等。结论]中国老年医学系统评价或者Meta分析的文献数量较多,但质量还有待提高。建议老年医学研究者能够提升循证研究能力,严格遵照规范报告格式撰写文献。

Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses in geriatrics in China

Objective] To evaluate reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses.Methods] CNKI,VIP,Wanfang,CBM data base were searched for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in geriatrics in China from the establishment date to May 2016.PRISMA and AMSTAR checklists were used to assess.Results] A total of 193 systematic reviews and Meta-analyses involving 65 systematic reviews and 128 Meta-analyses were identified.The quantity and quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses published on Chinese journal of geriatrics are increased and improved in recent years.The deficiencies of reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses mainly contained literature search,assessment of publication bias and publication funds.Conclusion] The reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses in geriatrics rises gradually over years in China,but it still needs to be further improved.The elder medical researchers need to promote evidence-based research capacity and strictly follow the standard format of report to write literature.