首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Social networks and symptomatic and functional outcomes in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors:Amy Degnan  " target="_blank">Katherine Berry  Daryl Sweet  " target="_blank">Kathryn Abel  Nick Crossley  " target="_blank">Dawn Edge
Institution:1.Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health,The University of Manchester,Manchester,UK;2.Division of Psychology and Mental Health,The University of Manchester,Manchester,UK;3.School of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work,Queen’s University,Belfast,UK;4.School of Social Sciences,The University of Manchester,Manchester,UK
Abstract:

Purpose

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the strength of associations between social network size and clinical and functional outcomes in schizophrenia.

Method

Studies were identified from a systematic search of electronic databases (EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) from January 1970 to June 2016. Eligible studies included peer-reviewed English language articles that examined associations between a quantitative measure of network size and symptomatic and/or functional outcome in schizophrenia-spectrum diagnoses.

Results

Our search yielded 16 studies with 1,929 participants. Meta-analyses using random effects models to calculate pooled effect sizes (Hedge’s g) found that smaller social network size was moderately associated with more severe overall psychiatric symptoms (N?=?5, n?=?467, g?=???0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI)?=???0.875, ??0.184, p?=?0.003) and negative symptoms (N?=?8, n?=?577, g?=???0.75, 95% CI?=???0.997, ??0.512, p?=?0.000). Statistical heterogeneity was observed I2?=?63.04%; I2?=?35.75%,) which could not be explained by low-quality network measures or sample heterogeneity in sensitivity analyses. There was no effect for positive symptoms (N?=?7, n?=?405, g?=???0.19, 95% CI?=?0.494, 0.110, p?=?0.213) or social functioning (N?=?3, n?=?209, g?=?0.36, 95% CI?=???0.078, 0.801, p?=?0.107). Narrative synthesis suggested that larger network size was associated with improved global functioning, but findings for affective symptoms and quality of life were mixed.

Conclusion

Psychosocial interventions which support individuals to build and maintain social networks may improve outcomes in schizophrenia. The review findings are cross-sectional and thus causal direction cannot be inferred. Further research is required to examine temporal associations between network characteristics and outcomes in schizophrenia and to test theoretical models relating to explanatory or mediating mechanisms.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号