Correlates of Non-Concordance between Perceived and Objective Measures of Walkability |
| |
Authors: | Klaus Gebel Adrian Bauman Neville Owen |
| |
Institution: | (1) Cluster for Physical Activity and Health, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia;(2) Cancer Prevention Research Centre, School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia |
| |
Abstract: | Background Objective and self-reported physical environmental attributes have been related to physical activity.
Purpose We examined the characteristics of adults who are resident in objectively identified high walkable neighborhoods but whose
perceptions of neighborhood attributes are not concordant with objective attributes relating to high walkability.
Methods Neighborhood built-environment attributes relating to walkability (dwelling density, intersection density, land use mix, and
net retail area) were determined objectively, using Geographic Information System databases; data on corresponding perceptions
of local environment attributes (from the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale) were derived from a self-completion
survey of a socially diverse sample of 2,650 adults aged 19 to 65. Objective and perceived walkability attributes were categorized
using median splits, and correlates of non-concordance were determined using multiple logistic regression models.
Results There was a fair overall agreement between objectively determined walkability and perceived walkability (Kappa = 0.35, 95%
CI = 0.31–0.39). Among those resident in objectively assessed high walkable areas (n = 1,063), 32.1% perceived them to be low walkable; conversely, 32.7% (n = 1,021) resident in objectively determined low walkability areas perceived them to be high. For residents of objectively
determined high walkable areas, the characteristics that differentiated those with perceptions of low walkability (non-concordant
perceptions) from those with concordant perceptions of high walkability were: not being university-educated (OR = 1.47, 95%
CI = 1.06–2.04); having lower household incomes (OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.09–2.17); being overweight (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.03–2.07);
and walking fewer days per week for transport (OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.11–2.70). Higher walking times and more positive cognitive
variables were noted among participants who lived in a neighborhood with low walkability that was perceived as high compared
to those who lived in a high walkable environment that was perceived as low walkable.
Conclusion Adults with lower educational attainment and lower incomes, who were overweight, or who were less physically active for transportation
purposes, were more likely to misperceive their high walkable neighborhood as low walkable. There is the potential for physical
activity promotion and persuasion strategies to address non-concordant perceptions, especially among those who live in high
walkable environments but perceive them to be low and also among those who are socially disadvantaged and are less active.
Perceptions of environmental attributes may be more strongly correlated with cognitive antecedents and with behavior than
are objective measures. |
| |
Keywords: | Walkability Walkable area Physical activity GIS Built environment Awareness |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|