首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

大连市中学生遭受校园欺凌现状及影响因素分析
引用本文:王润南,李瑞,王智勇,宋桂荣,张红亚,章吉威,雷芳,燕春婷,刘启贵. 大连市中学生遭受校园欺凌现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2021, 42(10): 1512-1515. DOI: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.10.016
作者姓名:王润南  李瑞  王智勇  宋桂荣  张红亚  章吉威  雷芳  燕春婷  刘启贵
作者单位:1.大连医科大学公共卫生学院卫生统计学教研室, 辽宁 116044
基金项目:2018年大连市科技创新基金项目2018J13SN108
摘    要:  目的  描述大连市中学生校园欺凌行为现状及影响因素, 为提出减少和防止校园欺凌行为发生的方法提供科学依据。  方法  采用多阶段分层整群抽样法抽取大连市城乡中学生, 共对2 540名中学生进行校园欺凌及相关因素问卷调查。  结果  大连中学生遭受校园欺凌报告率为25.11%;男生遭受躯体欺凌(5.99%)、言语欺凌(24.93%)报告率均高于女生(3.66%, 15.87%)(χ2值分别为6.56, 27.94, P值均 < 0.05);初中学生遭受言语欺凌(22.84%)、情感忽视(16.84%)报告率均高于高中学生(16.25%, 13.18%)(χ2值分别为14.21, 5.44, P值均 < 0.05);农村学生遭受躯体欺凌(6.07%)、言语欺凌(24.58%)、情感忽视(18.88%)报告率均高于城镇学生(3.55%, 16.05%, 12.06%)(χ2值分别为7.72, 24.81, 19.64, P值均 < 0.05)。男生、初中生、农村学生较女生、高中生、城市学生遭受校园欺凌程度更严重(Z值分别为3.46, 3.75, 5.89, P值均 < 0.01)。结构方程模型显示, 学习成绩(路径系数为-0.003)及父亲文化程度(路径系数为-0.004)对校园欺凌行为有直接作用, 母亲文化程度(间接作用系数-0.000 8)、身高(间接作用系数-0.000 3)、父亲文化程度(间接作用系数-0.000 3)、体重(间接作用系数0.000 2)均通过学习成绩对校园欺凌行为产生间接作用。  结论  大连市中学生校园欺凌行为发生率较高, 农村学生、初中学生、男生较易发生校园欺凌行为, 是重点的防控人群。提高学生学习成绩是降低校园欺凌行为的有利手段。

关 键 词:暴力   行为   精神卫生   模型   结构   学生
收稿时间:2021-01-12

Campus bullying victimization and its influencing factors among middle school students in Dalian
Affiliation:1.Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Dalian Medical University, Dalian(116044), Liaoning Province, China
Abstract:  Objective  To describe bullying victimization of middle school students in Dalian and associated factors, so as to provide scientific basis for campus bullying prevention.  Methods  The stratified cluster sampling method was used to select 2 540 middle school students from urban and rural areas in Dalian, who were investigated with campus bullying victimization and related factors.  Results  The reported rate of campus bullying victimization among middle school students in Dalian was 25.11%. The rates of physical violence (5.99%, 3.66%) and verbal violence(24.93%, 15.87%) of male students were higher than that of female students(χ2=6.56, 27.94, P < 0.05). The rates of verbal violence (22.84%, 16.25%) and emotional neglect(16.84%, 13.18%) of junior high school students were higher than those of high school students(χ2=14.21, 5.44, P < 0.05). The rates of physical violence(6.07%, 3.55%), verbal violence(24.58%, 16.05%) and emotional neglect(18.88%, 12.06%) of rural students were higher than those of urban students(χ2=7.72, 24.81, 19.64, P < 0.05). Male students, junior high school students and rural students suffered more severe campus bullying than female students, high school students and urban students(Z=3.46, 3.75, 5.89, P < 0.01). The structural equation model showed that academic performance (path coefficient -0.003) and father's education (path coefficient -0.004) have a direct negative effect on campus bullying behavior, while mother's education (indirect action coefficient -0.000 8), height(indirect action coefficient -0.000 3), father's education (indirect action coefficient -0.000 3) and weight (indirect action coefficient 0.000 2) indirect effects on campus bullying through academic performance.  Conclusion  The prevalence of campus bullying victimization among middle school students in Dalian is relatively high, which worths further attention to. Rural students, junior high school students and boys are more likely to suffer campus bullying. Improving academic performance might be beneficial for campus bullying prevention.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国学校卫生》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国学校卫生》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号