三种入肝血流阻断方式肝切除的临床应用比较

目的 比较三种不同入肝血流阻断肝切除方式的安全性及其对肝脏的损伤程度.方法 回顾性分析90例肝癌肝切除病例资料.接受全肝入肝血流阻断、半肝入肝血流阻断和保留半肝动脉阻断者各30例,比较其手术时间、出血量、术后肝功能恢复情况.结果 三种方式手术时间、出血量无差异,但半肝阻断组术中发生2例门静脉分支损伤,1例发生大出血.后两种方式术后1 d谷丙转氨酶和总胆红素上升较少、术后7 d恢复较快.结论 保留半肝动脉入肝血流阻断的肝切除是一种安全、简便的方法,适合于肿瘤位于半肝内(除尾状叶肿瘤),与第一、二、三肝门关系不密切,特别是合并严重肝硬化的病人.

Comparative study on three methods of hepatic vascular occlusion in hepatectomy

Objective To compare the safety and damage to liver function of 3 methods of hepatic infusive vascular occlusion in hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods Retrospectively, the clinical data of patients undergoing curative liver resection with pan- (n=30) and hemi(n= 30) vascular occlusion or hemi-hepatic artery reservation (n= 30) method were analyzed. Results All patients in the 3 groups had similar surgical duration and blood loss. Two and one patients from group 2 suffered from portal vein impairment and hemorrhea, respectively. Patients from group 1 had higher serum alanine aminotransferase and total bilirubin on days 1 and 7 after surgery. Conclusion Hepatectomy with hemi-hepatic artery reservation, which was not closely related to hepatic hilum, is safe and convenient for the resection of tumor involving hemi-liver and is especially suitable for the patients with severe liver cirrhosis.