The influence of an Enhanced Recovery Programme on clinical outcomes, costs and quality of life after surgery for colorectal cancer |
| |
Authors: | P. M. King,J. M. Blazeby&dagger ,P. Ewings,R. J. Longman,R. M. Kipling&Dagger ,P. J. Franks&dagger &dagger ,J. P. Sheffield§ ,L. B. Evans,M. Soulsby,S. H. Bulley¶ , R. H. Kennedy |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital, Yeovil, Somerset, UK. |
| |
Abstract: | OBJECTIVE: Optimizing peri-operative care using an enhanced recovery programme improves short-term outcomes following colonic resection. This study compared a prospective group of patients undergoing resection of colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme, with a prospectively studied historic cohort receiving conventional care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients underwent elective resection within an enhanced recovery programme (ERP). This incorporated pre-operative counselling, epidural analgesia, early feeding and mobilization. Clinical outcomes were compared with 86 prospectively studied historic control patients receiving conventional care (CC). All patients completed EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR38 and health economics questionnaires up to three months after surgery. RESULTS: Baseline clinical data were similar in both groups. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly reduced in the ERP, with patients staying 49% as long as those in the CC group including convalescent hospital stay (95% CI 39% to 61%P < 0.001). There were no differences in the number of complications, readmissions or re-operations. There were no significant differences in quality of life or health economic outcomes. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing colorectal resection within an ERP stay in hospital half as long as those receiving conventional care, with no increased morbidity, deterioration in quality of life or increased cost. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|