首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

急性心肌梗死恢复期新发房颤的发生率与危险因素
引用本文:汪沁沁,叶晨阳,任雨笙,樊 民,吴宗贵. 急性心肌梗死恢复期新发房颤的发生率与危险因素[J]. 心脏杂志, 2015, 27(5): 585-587
作者姓名:汪沁沁  叶晨阳  任雨笙  樊 民  吴宗贵
作者单位:(1.第二军医大学长征医院心血管内科,上海 200003;
摘    要:目的 分析急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者恢复期(心肌梗死28 d后)出现新发房颤的发生率与危险因素。方法 回顾性分析2009年6月~2011年6月全部212例因AMI入住长征医院治疗且无房颤病史的患者一般情况,相关检查结果,以及心肌梗死1年内后续治疗、转归情况,并对可能影响患者恢复期新发房颤的因素进行logistic回归模型分析。结果 多因素logistic回归分析表明,高龄(P<0.05,OR=5.61),高血压病(P<0.05,OR=5.89),左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低(P<0.01,OR=6.3),未行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)术(P<0.01,OR=6.01),糖尿病(P<0.05,OR=3.59)以及出院后无法耐受β受体阻滞剂治疗(P<0.01,OR=6.1)等是新发房颤的危险因素。结论 AMI患者恢复期出现新发房颤的危险因素为高龄,高血压病,LVEF降低,未行急诊PCI术,糖尿病以及出院后无法耐受β受体阻滞剂治疗。

关 键 词:心肌梗死  急性   房颤   危险因素   logistic回归模型
收稿时间:2015-01-25

Risk factors of new-onset atrial fibrillation during recovery period of acute myocardial infarction
Abstract:AIM To explore the risk factors of new onset atrial fibrillation (AF) during the recovery period (>28 days) of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS Clinical data of 212 AMI patients during 1 year after admission were retrospectively analyzed, including the general conditions, test results, treatment and follow-up data. Patients were admitted to hospital for AMI from June 2009 to June 2011. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to analyze the risk factors of new-onset AF after hospital discharge. RESULTS Logistic regression analysis showed that age >75 years (P<0.05, OR=5.61), hypertension (P<0.05, OR=5.89), LVEF<50% (P<0.01, OR=6.3), non-emergency PCI (P<0.01, OR=6.01), diabetes mellitus (P<0.05, OR=3.59) and β-blocker intolerance (P<0.01, OR=6.1) were associated with an increased risk of new-onset AF during the recovery period of myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION Age >75 years, hypertension, LVEF<50%, non-emergency PCI, diabetes mellitus and β-blocker intolerance are risk factors for new-onset AF during the recovery period of AMI.
Keywords:
点击此处可从《心脏杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《心脏杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号