Effectiveness of maintenance therapy of lithium vs other mood stabilizers in monotherapy and in combinations: a systematic review of evidence from observational studies |
| |
Authors: | Lars Vedel Kessing Michael Bauer Willem A Nolen Emanuel Severus Guy M Goodwin John Geddes |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department O, Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark;2. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark;3. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universit?t Dresden, Dresden, Germany;4. Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands;5. University Department of Psychiatry and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK |
| |
Abstract: | Objectives For the first time to present a systematic review of observational studies on the efficiency of lithium monotherapy in comparison with other maintenance mood stabilizers in monotherapy and in combination. Methods As part of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) Task Force on Lithium Treatment, we undertook a systematic literature search of non‐randomized controlled observational studies on (i) lithium monotherapy vs treatment with another maintenance mood stabilizer in monotherapy and (ii) lithium in combination with other mood stabilizers vs monotherapy. Results In eight out of nine identified studies including a total of < 14 000 patients, maintenance lithium monotherapy was associated with improved outcome compared with another mood stabilizer in monotherapy, including valproate, lamotrigine, olanzapine, quetiapine, unspecified anticonvulsants, carbamazepine/lamotrigine, unspecified atypical antipsychotics and unspecified antipsychotics. Among the four identified studies including a total of > 4000 patients comparing maintenance combination therapy with maintenance monotherapy, a few combination therapies were found to be superior to monotherapy in some analyses, but many were not. Conclusions The results show the superiority in real life of lithium monotherapy compared with monotherapy with other maintenance mood stabilizers. The four largest register‐based studies largely addressed confounding, but, as ever, residual confounding cannot be excluded. Nevertheless, the observational findings substantially add to the findings from randomized controlled trials, whose designs often limit the validity of comparison between medicines. |
| |
Keywords: | bipolar disorder lithium mania mood stabilizer non‐randomized trial observational |
|
|