首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


High expression of epithelial cellular adhesion molecule in peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer
Authors:Motohiro Imano  Tatsuki Itoh  Takao Satou  Atsushi Yasuda  Kohei Nishiki  Hiroaki Kato  Osamu Shiraishi  Ying-Feng Peng  Masayuki Shinkai  Masahiro Tsubaki  Takushi Yasuda  Haruhiko Imamoto  Shozo Nishida  Yoshifumi Takeyama  Hiroshi Furkawa  Kiyokata Okuno  Hitoshi Shiozaki
Affiliation:1. Department of Surgery, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-higashi Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, Japan, 589-8511
2. Cancer Center, Kinki University Hospital, 377-2 Ohno-higashi Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, Japan, 589-8511
3. Department of Pathology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-higashi Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, Japan, 589-8511
4. Division of Pharmacotherapy, Kinki University Faculty of Pharmacy, 3-4-1 Kowakae Higashi-Osaka, Osaka, Japan, 577-5802
Abstract:Intraperitoneally administrated epithelial cellular adhesion molecule (EpCAM) monoclonal antibody is a therapeutic agent in patients with malignant effusion in several types of carcinoma. However, the role of EpCAM in peritoneal metastasis (PM) lesions and primary lesions of gastric cancer (GC) is still unclear. Therefore, in this study, we investigated EpCAM expression in GC patients with PM. We investigated the expression of EpCAM in 35PM lesions and 104 biopsy samples as primary lesions. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using the Ventana Benchmark XT (Roche Diagnostics) system. EpCAM expression was evaluated by calculating the total immunostaining score, which is the product of the proportion score and the intensity score. Overexpression was defined as a total score greater than 4. All PM specimens showed overexpression of EpCAM, and GC cells in both the surface layer and the deep layer of the PM showed a high expression of EpCAM. Meanwhile, in the biopsy sample, the expression of EpCAM ranged from none to strong. The EpCAM score results for PM specimens and biopsy samples were 11.0?±?2.0 and 6.9?±?3.9, respectively. The difference between the scores was statistically significant (P?
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号