局部晚期宫颈癌CT引导组织间插植BT与腔内BT剂量学与近期疗效比较

目的 探讨CT引导下组织间插植BT技术较传统腔内BT技术在局部晚期宫颈癌治疗中的剂量学优势,提供一种更加有利的临床治疗方法。方法 28例经过体外放疗后仍残留巨大肿块(肿瘤> 5 cm)的局部晚期宫颈癌患者接受CT引导下的组织间插植BT。将该研究的剂量学结果,包括总剂量(体外放疗和BT)的HR-CTV D90和膀胱、直肠及乙状结肠的D2cc,与之前一组接受传统腔内BT (宫腔管+卵圆体对)的30例患者进行比较分析。结果 HR-CTV D90的平均值在腔内BT组、组织间插植BT组分别为(76.9±5.7)、(88.1±3.3) Gy。膀胱、直肠、乙状结肠D2cc在腔内BT组和组织间插植BT组中分别为(84.7±6.8)、(69.2±4.2)、(67.8±4.5) Gy 和(81.8±6.5)、(66.8±4.0)、(64.8±4.1) Gy。1年LC率在腔内BT组和组织间插植BT组分别为59.3%和85.2%。结论 与传统腔内BT相比较,CT引导下组织间插植BT技术具有剂量学优势或许是临床可行的,但长期疗效和不良反应还需进一步评估。

Dosimetry and short term effect comparison of CT-guided interstitial brachytherapy and intracavitary brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer

Objective To discuss the dosimetric advantage of computed tomography-guided interstitial brachytherapy compared with the conventional intracavitary brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer,offering a more advantageous clinical treatment approach. Methods Twenty-eight locally advanced cervical cancer patients with bulky tumors (tumor size>5 cm) after external beam radiotherapy received computed tomography-guided interstitial brachytherapy. Dosimetric outcomes of the current study,including the total dose (external beam radiotherapy+ brachytherapy) D90 for the HR-CTV and D2cc for the bladder,rectum,and sigmoid,were compared with a former patient group consisting of 30 patients who received the conventional intracavitary brachytherapy (uterine tandem+ ovoid pairs). Results The mean D90 value for HR-CTV in the intracavitary brachytherapy group and interstitial brachytherapy group were (76.9±5.7) and (88.1±3.3) Gy,respectively. The D2cc for the bladder,rectum,and sigmoid in the intracavitary brachytherapy group and interstitial brachytherapy group were (84.7±6.8) Gy,(69.2±4.2) Gy,(67.8±4.5) Gy and (81.8±6.5) Gy,(6.8±4.0) Gy,(64.8±4.1) Gy,respectively.1-year local tumor control rate in the intracavitary brachytherapy group and interstitial brachytherapy group were 59.3% and 85.2%,respectively. Conclusions CT-guided interstitial brachytherapy shows a significant dosimetric advantage compared with the conventional intracavitary brachytherapy,and is,thereby,clinically possible feasible. However,the long term curative effect and toxicity need to be further investigated.