A narrative review of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer |
| |
Authors: | Douglas C. Cheung Neil Fleshner Shomik Sengupta Dixon Woon |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada;2.Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia;3.Urology Unit, Eastern Health, Victoria, Australia |
| |
Abstract: | Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is an important component in the staging and prognostication of prostate cancer. We performed a narrative review to assess the literature surrounding PLND: (I) the current guideline recommendations and contemporary utilization, (II) the calculation of patient-specific risk to perform PLND using available nomograms, (III) to review the extent of dissection, and its associated outcomes and complications. Due to the improved lymph node yield, better staging, and theoretical improvement in the control of micro-metastatic disease, guidelines have supported the use of (extended-) PLND in patients deemed to be at intermediate or high risk of lymph node involvement (often at a threshold of 5% on modern risk nomograms). However, in practice, real-world utilization of PLND varies considerably due to multiple reasons. Conflicting evidence persists with no clear oncological benefit to PLND, and a small, but important, risk of morbidity. Complications are rare, but include lymphoceles; thromboembolic events; and more rarely, obturator nerve, vascular, and ureteric injury. Furthermore, changing disease incidence and stage migration in the context of earlier detection overall have led to a decreased risk of nodal disease. The trade-offs between the benefits, harms, and risk tolerance/threshold must be carefully considered between each patient and their clinician. |
| |
Keywords: | Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) pelvic lymphadenectomy prostate cancer staging treatment |
|
|