首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

米氮平与氟西汀治疗抑郁症的疗效对比分析
引用本文:谢年秀,赵焕华,狄良宝,杨忠.米氮平与氟西汀治疗抑郁症的疗效对比分析[J].四川精神卫生,2004,17(1):32-34.
作者姓名:谢年秀  赵焕华  狄良宝  杨忠
作者单位:215500,江苏省常熟市精神卫生防治所
摘    要:目的 评价米氮平治疗抑郁症的临床疗效和安全性。方法 将符合CCMD - 3抑郁症诊断标准的 6 1例抑郁症患者随机分为米氮平组 (31例 )和氟西汀组 (30例 ) ,治疗 6周。用汉密顿抑郁量表 (HAMD)评定疗效 ,用副反应量表 (TESS)评定副反应。结果 米氮平组和氟西汀组的有效率分别为 78%和 77% ,二者比较差异无显著性 (P >0 0 5 ) ,但米氮平起效快 ,副反应轻。结论 米氮平是一种安全有效的新一代抗抑郁药。

关 键 词:米氮平  氟西汀  抑郁症
文章编号:1007-3256(2004)01-0032-03

A comparative study of mirtazapine and fluoxetine for depressive patients
XIE Nianxiu,ZHAO Huanhua,DI Liangbao,et al..A comparative study of mirtazapine and fluoxetine for depressive patients[J].Sichuan Mental Health,2004,17(1):32-34.
Authors:XIE Nianxiu  ZHAO Huanhua  DI Liangbao  
Institution:XIE Nianxiu,ZHAO Huanhua,DI Liangbao,et al.Changshu Station for Prevention and Treatment of Mental Health,Jiangsu 215500,China
Abstract:Objective The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine for the depressive patients.Methods A controlled study was carried out between 61 patients who met the CCMD-3 criteriaon of major depression and depressed episode.The 31 of total patients were treated with mirtazapine and the others were treated with fluoxetine for 6 weeks.The efficacy was assessed by Hamilton depression rating scale(HAMD) and the safety was assessed by treatment emergent sympton scale(TESS). Results After 6 weeks treatment,the efficacy rate of the mirtazapine group and the fluoxetine group were 78% and 77%,respectively.The results have no remarkable differences in two groups(P>0.05).There were rapid response and minimal side effects in mirtazapine group.Conclusion Mirtazapine is an effective and safe antidepressant.
Keywords:Mirtazapine  Fluoxetine  Depression
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号