首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

口腔科无菌持物钳不同消毒方法的比较研究
引用本文:吴碧君 王琴 周壮丽 王碧羽. 口腔科无菌持物钳不同消毒方法的比较研究[J]. 中华医学研究杂志, 2005, 5(9): 866-867
作者姓名:吴碧君 王琴 周壮丽 王碧羽
作者单位:诸暨市人民医院,浙江诸暨311800
摘    要:目的 为解决口腔科诊疗中戊二醛浸泡的无菌持物钳夹持无菌器械、物品后残留液对皮肤、粘膜的腐蚀性与刺激性。方法 对两种消毒方法采用分组、分次和分时段进行微生物学监测。结果 用传统的2%戊二醛浸泡无菌持物钳与干燥状态下4h内无菌持物钳的菌落计数结果表明差异无显著性(P〉0.05)。结论 在常温、常湿环境下,经高压蒸汽灭菌后干燥的无菌持物钳可在4h内夹持无菌物品及器械,该方法使口腔科常规诊疗操作更加安全。

关 键 词:无菌持物钳 监测
文章编号:1680-6115(2005)09-0866-02
收稿时间:2005-05-20

The studay on different sterilization methods of aseptic clipper in department of stomatology
WU Bi-jun, WANG Qin , ZHOU Zhuang-li ,et al.. The studay on different sterilization methods of aseptic clipper in department of stomatology[J]. JOurnal of Chinese Medicine Research, 2005, 5(9): 866-867
Authors:WU Bi-jun   WANG Qin    ZHOU Zhuang-li   et al.
Affiliation:WU Bi-jun, WANG Qin , ZHOU Zhuang-li , et al.
Abstract:To solve skin and mucosal causticity and harmfulness by glutaral residual fluid in aseptic clipper for patients in department of stomatology. Methods Biological monitoring of aseptic clipper under two states was made and analysed. Results Germ of surface in aseptic clipper by vapor sterilization was not detected within four houres. Conclusion This mothed is similarly effective and safer, compared with traditional sterilisation by 2% glutaraldehyde.
Keywords:aseptic clipper   monitoring
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号