头发交叉固定术治疗头皮裂伤

目的 应用头发交叉固定术(hair apposition technique,HAT)治疗头皮裂伤,比较HAT与传统清创缝合术的优缺点.方法 将50名急诊头皮裂伤患者分为HAT组和对照组.HAT组(30例)采用头发交叉组织胶固定术治疗,对照组(20例)采用传统清创缝合术治疗.分别比较两组在操作时间、疼痛评分、患者接受程度和并发症等方面的差别.结果 HAT组的清创时间(min)少于对照组(3.33 4±1.65)vs.(6.05 4±2.32);t=4.85,P<0.01];HAT组的疼痛评分低于对照组(1.73 4±1.01)vs (3.20 4±1.58);t:4.01,P<0.01];患者对HAT的接受程度高于对照组(100%/35.55%,X2=16.46,P<0.01).结论 应用HAT治疗头皮裂伤具有操作简单、疼痛较轻、伤口愈合满意,患者接受度高等优点,适合在急诊应用.

Treatment of hair apposition technique with tissue glue on scalp lacerations

Objective To treat scalp lacerations by using the hair apposition technique (HAT) and to compare the HAT with standard suturing in a controlled prospective trial. Method Fifty patients with scalp lacerations were treated either by HAT or by standard suturing. Two groups were evaluated in consumed times for operation, pain sores, and complications. Results There were 30 HAT patients and 20 patients treated with suturing. The took shorter operation time consumed(3.33 vs. (6.05 t = 4.85.P < 0.01], and HAT produced significantly lower pain score (1.73vs. (3.20t = 4.01,P < 0.01]. There was a trend that more and more patients were willing to have HAT performed. Conclusions The advantages of HAT include a shorter time consumed for operation, less pain, satisfactory wound healing, and high acceptance by patients. HAT is acceptable for treating scalp lacerations in emergency room.