Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Ashworth Scale and the Disability Assessment Scale in patients with upper-limb poststroke spasticity |
| |
Authors: | Brashear Allison Zafonte Ross Corcoran Michael Galvez-Jimenez Nestor Gracies Jean-Michel Gordon Mark Forrest McAfee Anita Ruffing Kyle Thompson Barbara Williams Michael Lee Chia-Ho Turkel Catherine |
| |
Affiliation: | Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. abrashea@iupui.edu |
| |
Abstract: | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of the Ashworth Scale and the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) in poststroke patients with upper-limb spasticity and functional disability. DESIGN: Single-center trial. SETTING: University medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Nine patients > or = 6 months poststroke with upper-limb spasticity and impairment in the areas of hygiene, dressing, limb posture, or pain were included in the analysis. INTERVENTIONS: Ten experienced medical professionals rated each patient in randomized order twice on the same day (results based on mean of evaluations at times 1 and 2). Elbow, wrist, finger, and thumb flexion tones were assessed by using the Ashworth score (range, 0-4), and functional disability was assessed using the DAS (range, 0-3). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intra- and interrater reliability of the Ashworth Scale and DAS. RESULTS: For the Ashworth parameters, 38 of 40 evaluations indicated excellent (weighted kappa > or = .75) or good (weighted kappa > or = .4) intrarater reliability. For DAS parameters, 31 of 40 evaluations indicated excellent or good intrarater reliability. The interrater reliability was also good for both the Ashworth Scale (Kendall W=.598-.792) and DAS (Kendall W=.494-.772) with statistically significant agreement found among raters (all P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with upper-limb spasticity after stroke, the Ashworth Scale and DAS had good intra- and interrater reliability when used by trained medical professions. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|