2015-2019年我国护理核心期刊中系统评价类研究的范围综述

目的:描述我国护理核心期刊2015-2019年发表系统评价类研究的种类、研究方法和文献报告进展。方法:使用JBI范围综述方法对文献进行描述性分析。结果:共纳入740篇文献,包括量性研究系统评价、质性研究系统评价、系统评价再评价和范围综述。68.2%的文献完全呈现了结构化研究问题。平均每篇文献检索证据资源(7.29±2.15)个。检索频率最高的中英文证据资源分别是CNKI(95.5%)和PubMed/Medline(92.8%)。只有19.1%检索了灰色文献。Cochrane风险偏倚评估工具和JBI系列工具在质量评价工具中的使用频率最高。在论文撰写中有较多信息缺失或记录不详。结论:我国护理核心期刊上发表的系统评价类研究数量稳步增加,研究方法更加丰富。但是研究的方法学质量和报告学质量亟需提高,以提高系统评价证据质量,为循证护理事业发展助力。

Studies of Systematic Reviews published in Chinese nursing core journals from 2015 to 2019: a Scoping Review

Objective: To explore the progress of the kinds, methodological quality and reporting quality of Systematic Reviews published in Chinese nursing core journals from 2015 to 2019. Methods: The JBI approach to the conduct of scoping reviews was followed. Results: Totally 740 studies were included. They were quantitative Systematic Reviews, qualitative Systematic Reviews, umbrella reviews, and Scoping Reviews. Totally 68.2% articles formulated research questions with all key elements. The average number of databases searched was 7.29±2.15 per article. The most popular databases searched were CNKI(95.5%) in Chinese and PubMed/Medline(92.8%) in English. Only 19.1% studies searched grey literature. The most popular critical appraisal tool was the Cochrane tool, followed by the JBI tools. More information should be provided in the report. Conclusion: The amount of Systematic Reviews published in Chinese nursing core journals increased steadily from 2015 to 2019. A variety of Systematic Reviews were conducted. The methodological quality and reporting quality of Systematic Reviews should be improved greatly, so that stronger evidences could be provided to enhance evidence-based nursing in China.