| 摘 要： | Aims In the HORIZONS trial, in-hospital treatment with bivalirudin reduced bleeding and mortality in primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) compared with heparin and routine glycoprotein Ⅱb / Ⅲa inhibitors(GPI). It is unknown whether this advantage of bivalirudin is observed in comparison with heparins only with GPI used as bailout. Methods and results In the EUROMAX study, 2198 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) were randomized during transport for primary PCI to bivalirudin or to heparins with optional GPI. Primary and principal outcome was the composites of death or nonCABG-related major bleeding at 30 days. This pre-specified analysis compared patients receiving bivalirudin(n = 1089) with those receiving heparins with routine upstream GPI(n = 649) and those receiving heparins only with GPI use restricted to bailout(n = 460). The primary outcome death and major bleeding occurred in5.1% with bivalirudin, 7.6% with heparin plus routine GPI(HR 0.67 and 95% CI 0.46-0.97, P = 0.034),and 9.8% with heparins plus bailout GPI(HR 0.52 and 95% CI 0.35-0.75, P = 0.006). Following adjustment by logistic regression, bivalirudin was still associated with significantly lower rates of the primary outcome(odds ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.87) and major bleeding(odds ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.24 – 0.82) compared with heparins alone with bailout GPI. Rates of stent thrombosis were higher with bivalirudin(1.6 vs. 0.6 vs.0.4%, P = 0.09 and 0.09). Conclusion Bivalirudin, started during transport for primary PCI, reduces major bleeding compared with both patients treated with heparin only plus bailout GPI and patients treated with heparin and routine GPI, but increased stent thrombosis.
|
