首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Multicentre randomized trial of sotalol vs amiodarone for chronic malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias
Authors:AMIODARONE VS SOTALOL STUDY GROUP  
Abstract:Sotalol was compared with amiodarone in this open randomizedmulticentre study of patients with ventricular tachycardia orfibrillation not associated with acute myocardial infarctionrefractory to or intolerant of Class I drugs. 16 of 30 patientstreated with amiodarone completed 12 months on therapy, fivewere withdrawn because of recurrent ventricular tachycardiaand nine because of presumed adverse drug reactions, complianceproblems or protocol violation. Four of those who were withdrawndied within 12 months. Sixteen of 29 patients completed 12 months on sotalol, one waswithdrawn because of ventricular tachycardia and nine becauseof presumed adverse drug reactions, poor compliance or the needfor coronary artery surgery. Three died on treatment and twoafter withdrawal but within 12 months of entering the study. When the results are analysed by intention to treat there wasno significant difference in antiarrhythmic efficacy or in theincidence of side-effects severe enough to warrant withdrawalfrom the trial. There was an increase in left ventricular ejectionfraction in those treated with sotalol, which, because of itspharmacokine-tics, is an attractive alternative to amiodaronefor patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias who cantolerate ß-adrenergic blockade.
Keywords:Sotalol    amiodarone    ventricular tachycardia    ventricular fibrillation
本文献已被 Oxford 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号