The management of differentiated thyroid cancer using 123I for imaging to assess the need for 131I therapy |
| |
Authors: | Ali Nidhal Sebastian Cherry Foley Rosemary R Murray Iain Canizales Ana L Jenkins Paul J Drake William M Plowman P Nicholas Besser G Michael Chew Shern L Grossman Ashley B Monson John P Britton Keith E |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK. |
| |
Abstract: | BACKGROUND: Follow-up of 131I whole-body scanning after 131I ablation is associated with potential stunning. Previous studies have suggested that, for scanning, 123I is more sensitive than 131I in identifying thyroid tissue, but its specificity when positive is less certain. AIM: The use of 123I as an imaging agent in place of serial 131I imaging has been evaluated in the surveillance and treatment of differentiated thyroid carcinoma. RESULTS: A total of 186 studies in 136 patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma were evaluated after total or near total thyroidectomy followed by 131I ablation. In 125 studies 123I scanning was negative and no 131I therapy was given; four patients were positive on 123I scanning but for other reasons no 131I therapy was given. In 48/49 patients a positive 123I scan was followed by positive 131I therapeutic uptake. Only one patient failed to show positive uptake of I when first treated and she subsequently demonstrated uptake on a second therapy. CONCLUSION: High-dose 123I imaging is the correct predictor of the 131I post-therapy scan findings in most cases, at an administered activity that avoids stunning. As a diagnostic agent it is preferable to 131I in differentiated thyroid carcinoma. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|