首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

子宫颈癌组织中抑癌基因DNA甲基化的检测
引用本文:Xu J,Wang HL,Lu GC,Wang ZJ,Lin X,Zhou HW. 子宫颈癌组织中抑癌基因DNA甲基化的检测[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2007, 42(6): 394-397
作者姓名:Xu J  Wang HL  Lu GC  Wang ZJ  Lin X  Zhou HW
作者单位:上海市第八人民医院妇产科,200233
基金项目:上海市科学技术委员会科研计划项目课题(044119733)
摘    要:目的 通过分析宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)和宫颈癌组织中p16、CDH1、RASSF1A和TIMP3基因DNA甲基化的变化情况,探讨其在宫颈癌发生中的意义。方法 用甲基化特异性聚合酶链反应技术(MSP)对CINI组(40份)、CINⅡ~Ⅲ(40份)、宫颈癌组(40份)病变组织中p16、CDH1、RASSF1A和TIMP3基因DNA甲基化程度进行检测。另取正常宫颈组织20份作为对照组。结果(1)对照组中p16、CDH1、RASSF1A和TIMP3基因的DNA甲基化阳性率均为0。(2)p16和CDH1基因的DNA甲基化阳性率,CIN11~m组(分别为22%、35%)明显高于CINI组(分别为2%、5%,P〈0.05);RASSF1A和TIMP3基因的DNA甲基化阳性率,CINⅡ~Ⅲ组(分别为12%、15%)虽高于CINI组(均为2%),但差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。(3)宫颈癌组p16(40%)、CDH1(58%)、RASSF1A(20%)和TIMP3(35%)基因的DNA甲基化阳性率虽均高于CINⅡ-Ⅲ组,但差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。(4)宫颈癌组p16、CDH1、RASSF1A和TIMP3基因的DNA甲基化阳性率均高于CINI组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。(5)上述基因的DNA甲基化的总阳性率(即任何一个基因出现甲基化即为阳性),宫颈癌组(90%)明显高于CINⅡ~Ⅲ组(55%,P〈0.05),且此两组均明显高于CINI组(8%,P〈0.05)。结论 随着从宫颈不典型增生向浸润癌的进展,p16、CDH1、RASSF1 A和,TIMP3基因的DNA甲基化阳性率明显升高,提示抑癌基因的DNA甲基化在宫颈癌发生、发展中起着一定作用,可能成为判断宫颈癌发生、发展的重要指标。

关 键 词:宫颈肿瘤 宫颈上皮内瘤样病变 基因  肿瘤抑制 DNA甲基化
修稿时间:2006-12-27

Clinical significance of detection of tumor suppressor genes aberrant methylation in cervical carcinoma tissue
Xu Jun,Wang Hong-Lin,Lu Gao-Chuan,Wang Zhi-Jie,Lin Xiao,Zhou Hong-Wei. Clinical significance of detection of tumor suppressor genes aberrant methylation in cervical carcinoma tissue[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007, 42(6): 394-397
Authors:Xu Jun  Wang Hong-Lin  Lu Gao-Chuan  Wang Zhi-Jie  Lin Xiao  Zhou Hong-Wei
Affiliation:Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eighth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai 200233, China.
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To investigate the change of aberrant methylation of p16, CDH, RASSF1A and TIMP3 in cervical carcinoma and their significance in cervical carcinoma. METHODS: Using the bisulfite-modification technique and methylation-specific PCR (MSP), we examined the aberrant promoter hypermethylation patterns of 4 tumor suppressor genes (p16, CDH1, RASSF1A, TIMP3) in 140 samples of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CINI, n = 40), CINII-III (n = 40), cervical carcinomas (CC, n = 40), and normal cervical tissue as a control group (n = 20). RESULTS: (1) Methylation was completely absent in control tissues. (2) Significant differences between CINII-III group and CINI group were detected for p16 and CDH1 (22% vs 2%, P < 0.05; 35% vs 5%, P < 0.05), while there were no significant differences between the two groups for RASSF1A and TIMP3 (12% vs 2%, P > 0.05; 15% vs 2%, P > 0.05). (3) The presence of methylation of p16 (40%), CDH1 (58%), RASSF1A (20%) and TIMP3 (35%) in CC were higher than the corresponding CINII-III group, but with no significant differences (P > 0.05). (4) Significant differences between CC and CINIfor p16, CDH1, RASSF1A and TIMP3 genes (P < 0.05) were observed. (5) Methylation for at least one gene was a frequent event. These figures in CC 90% (36/40) were significantly different from CINII-III 55% (22/40; P < 0.05). In comparison between CINI8% (3/40) and CC and CINII-III, these figures were significantly different (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among the four genes, p16, CDH, RASSF1A and TIMP3, there is a significant trend for increased methylation with increasing degree of histopathological change. It suggests that the aberrant methylation of tumor suppressor genes plays a role during cervical cancer development. This may help identify women at increased risk for or cancer development and progression.
Keywords:Cervix neoplasms    Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia   Genes, tumor suppressor   DNA methylation
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号