两种内固定治疗锁骨骨折的疗效比较

目的：比较分析克氏针固定与解剖钢板固定治疗锁骨骨折的临床疗效.方法：2005年6月到2008年5月我院收治的锁骨骨折患者,随机抽取克氏针治疗组患者39例作为观察组,解剖钢板固定治疗组40例作为对照组.两组患者共79例,男35例,女44例;年龄18～65（43.2±5.74）岁.随访6～24（8±2）个月.术后按美国肩肘协会评分系统（ASES）进行评分.结果：两组在手术时间、术中出血量,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）.而在住院时间、术后并发症、术后肩关节功能恢复程度比较,差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）.结论：采用克氏针髓内固定治疗锁骨骨折手术创伤小,术中出血少,疗效满意.

Two kind of in fixed treatment collar bone bone fracture curative effect to compare

Objective：Comparative analysis Cleveland needle fixed and dissection steel plate fixed treatment collar bone bone fracture clinical curative effect. Methods： In June, 2005 to May, 2008 my courtyard admitting collar bone bone fracture patient, the draw an item at random Cleveland needle treatment group patient 39 examples takes the observation group, dissects the steel plate fixed treatment group 40 examples to take the control group. Two group of patient altogether 79 examples, male 35 examples, female 44 examples;Age 18-65（43. 2±5. 74） year old. Makes a follow-up visit for 6-24（8±2） month. After the technique grades system （ASES） according to American Shoulder Elbow Association to carry on grading. Results：Two groups in the surgery time,the technique bleed the quantity, the difference have statistics significance （P〈0.05）. But after in hospital time, the technique the complication, the technique the shoulder joint function restores the degree comparison, the difference non-statistics significance （P〉0.05）. Conclusion： Uses in the Cleveland needle marrow the fixed treatment collar bone bone fracture surgery wound to be small,in the technique bleeds few, curative effect satisfaction.