Comparing the effects of stimulation and propofol infusion rate on implicit and explicit memory formation |
| |
Authors: | Andrade J Englert L Harper C Edwards N D |
| |
Institution: | 1Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TP, UK. 2University Department of Anaesthetics, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK*Corresponding author |
| |
Abstract: | Doubt remains about the conditions under which learning persistsdespite anaesthesia. This study investigated the relative importanceof dose of anaesthetic and stimulation for learning during propofolinfusion before surgery. Thirty-six patients were randomly assignedto three groups. Group 1 received two word lists (category examplesand nonsense words) during infusion of propofol to a targetconcentration of 2 µg ml1. Groups 2 and3 received the word lists during infusion of propofol 5 µg ml1.Group 2 received nonsense words before tracheal intubation andcategory examples during intubation; Group 3 heard categoryexamples before and nonsense words during intubation. Bispectralindex was recorded as a measure of depth of sedation/anaesthesia.We assessed explicit memory on recovery using a structured interviewand a recognition test. We assessed implicit memory using acategory generation test and a preference rating task. To establishbaseline, a control group of 12 patients completed the categorygeneration test without receiving the category examples duringanaesthesia. Overall, there was no evidence for learning duringpropofol infusion, though the category generation task showeda trend towards more implicit memory for words presented duringintubation than during anaesthesia. We conclude that learningdoes not occur during anaesthesia without surgery. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 18995 |
| |
Keywords: | memory anaesthetics i v propofol monitoring bispectral index |
本文献已被 PubMed Oxford 等数据库收录! |
|