两种方法治疗小儿支气管肺炎临床观察

目的：比较序贯疗法和常规静脉滴注法治疗支气管肺炎的临床疗效。方法：将70例小儿支气管肺炎随机分为序贯疗法组36例和静脉滴注法组34例,观察两组疗效。结果：序贯疗法组痊愈69.4%（25/36）,显效19.4%（7/36）,进步11.1%（4/36）,无效0例,总有效率88.9%（32/36）。静脉滴注组：痊愈73.5%（25/34）,显效17.6%（6/34）,进步8.8%（3/34）,无效0例,总有效率91.6%。两组在治疗效果、总有效率上无显著性差异（t=2.94,P〉0.05）;序贯疗法组住院时间（6.0±0.9）d与静脉滴注组（8.0±1.5）d比较有显著性差异（t=7.92,P〈0.01）。序贯疗法组总疗程（10.6±1.4）d与静脉滴注组（10.0±1.3）d比较无显著性差异（t=1.94,P〉0.05）。结论：序贯治疗能节省治疗费用、降低院内交叉感染、减轻患儿痛苦。

Clinical observation in Children with bronchopneumonia by two methods

Objective:To compare sequential therapy and conventional intravenous infusion treatment of the clinical effect of bronchopneumonia.Methods:70 cases of bronchopneumonia in children were randomly divided into sequential therapy group(n=36)and intravenous infusion group(n=34),the effects were observed.Results:The sequential therapy group recovery 69.4%(25/36),effective 19.4%(7/36),improvement 11.1%(4/36),invalid 0,and the total efficiency rate is 88.9%(32/36).Intravenous infusion group:73.5% recovery(25/34),effective 17.6%(6/34),improvement 8.8%(3/34),invalid 0,and the total efficiency rate is 91.6%.and there is no significant difference(t=2.94,P>0.05)in the total efficiency and overall treatment time between the two group,there is significant difference in the duration of hospitalization between the two group.Conclusion:The sequential therapy treatment can save costs,reduce hospital cross-infection and reduce pain in children with bronchopneumonia.