首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Quality of Korotkoff sounds: bell vs diaphragm, cubital fossa vs brachial artery
Authors:R J Prineas  D Jacobs
Institution:Laboratory of Physiological Hygiene, School of Public Health, Stadium Gate 27, 611 Beacon Street SE, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 USA
Abstract:Comparison of clarity of Korotkoff sounds was made between those heard with the bell or diaphragm of the stethoscope and between those heard over the cubital fossa or more proximally and medially over the maximal brachial artery pulse--during indirect sphygmomanometry. Multiple measurements were made by two trained technicians on 48 supine adults. The measurements were balanced as to stethoscope-head/arm-placement combinations, stethoscope used, control of the pressure bulb, and use of right or left arm. The Korotkoff sounds were heard better with the bell of the stethoscope placed over the brachial artery pulse (BB) than with the diaphragm placed over the cubital fossa (DC). The former combination (BB) gave significantly higher blood pressure estimates for systolic blood pressure and fourth phase diastolic blood pressure than the latter combination (DC).
Keywords:To whom reprints requests should be addressed  
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号