首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Second‐Generation Drug‐Eluting Balloon for Ostial Side Branch Lesions (001‐Bifurcations): Mid‐Term Clinical and Angiographic Results
Authors:Beatriz Vaquerizo M.D.   Ph.D.  Eduardo Fernández‐Nofreiras M.D.  Inmanol Oategui M.D.  Javier Suarez de Lezo M.D.  José Ramón Rumoroso M.D.  Pedro Martín M.D.  Helen Routledge F.R.C.P  M.D.  Helena Tizón‐Marcos M.D.
Affiliation:1. Interventional Cardiology Unit, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain;2. Interventional Cardiology Unit, Hospital Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain;3. Interventional Cardiology Unit, Hospital Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain;4. Interventional Cardiology Unit, Hospital Vall Hebron, Barcelona, Spain;5. Interventional Cardiology Unit, H. Reina Sofia, Córdoba, Spain;6. Interventional Cardiology Unit, Hospital Galdakao, Galdakao, Spain;7. Interventional Cardiology Unit, H. Dr. Negrín, Gran Canaria, Spain;8. Department of Cardiology, Worcestershire Royal Hospital, Worcester, UK
Abstract:

Background

In the drug‐eluting stent era, the best strategy to treat Medina 001 lesion remains unestablished. This is the first prospective registry assessing the efficacy and safety of the second‐generation drug‐coated balloon in patients with side‐branch ostial lesion.

Methods

Forty‐nine patients with de novo Medina 001 lesion and associated myocardial ischemia were treated with second‐generation drug‐coated balloon—Dior balloon catheter (Eurocor GmbH, Bonn Germany), and prospectively included in this study. After mandatory pre‐dilatation, a paclitaxel‐eluting balloon was inflated for a minimum of 45 seconds. Left main bifurcation, severely calcified lesions and cardiogenic shock, were the only exclusion criteria.

Results

The inclusion period was 2.7 years. Mean age was 62 ± 12 years old, 41% diabetic, 65% presented with acute coronary syndrome. The most common vessel treated was the first diagonal (50%). Pre‐dilatation with a cutting balloon was used in 59%. Angiographic success was 86% (in 14% a bare metal stent was implanted because of acute recoil [n = 5] or coronary dissection more than type B [n = 2]). At a mean of 12.2 ± 2.2 months, major cardiac adverse events rate was 14.3% (1 myocardial infarction, 0 cardiac deaths, 7 target lesion revascularization). There was no thrombosis or occlusion. At a mean of 7.2 ± 1.1 months, binary restenosis was 22.5% (n = 7) with a late loss of 0.32 ± 0.73 mm.

Conclusion

Medina 001 lesion is an infrequent type of coronary lesion. Drug‐coated balloon—Dior is a safe and technically easy therapeutic option, associated with acceptable mid‐term clinical outcomes. (J Interven Cardiol 2016;29:285–292)
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号