Low-dose steroids in adult septic shock: results of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign |
| |
Authors: | Brian Casserly Herwig Gerlach Gary S. Phillips Stanley Lemeshow John C. Marshall Tiffany M. Osborn Mitchell M. Levy |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. University of Limerick, Graduate Entry Medical School, Limerick, Ireland 2. The Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, RI, USA 3. Division of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Vivantes-Klinikum Neukoelln, Berlin, Germany 4. The Ohio State University Center for Biostatistics, Columbus, OH, USA 5. The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA 6. Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 7. Department of Surgery and Division of Emergency Medicine, Surgical/Trauma Critical Care, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA 8. Division of Critical Care, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
|
| |
Abstract: | Objective The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) developed guidelines and treatment bundles for the administration of steroids in adult septic shock. However, it is not clear how this has affected clinical practice or patient outcome. Design and setting The SSC has developed an extensive database to assess the overall effect of its guidelines on clinical practice and patient outcome. This analysis focuses on one particular element of the SSC’s management bundle, namely, the administration of low-dose steroids in adult septic shock. This analysis was conducted on data submitted from January 2005 through March 2010 including 27,836 subjects at 218 sites. Main results A total of 17,847 (of the total 27,836) patients in the database required vasopressor therapy despite fluid resuscitation and therefore met the eligibility criteria for receiving low-dose steroids. A total of 8,992 patients (50.4?%) received low-dose steroids for their septic shock. Patients in Europe (59.4?%) and South America (51.9?%) were more likely to be prescribed low-dose steroids compared to their counterparts in North America (46.2?%, p?0.001). The adjusted hospital mortality was significantly higher (OR 1.18, 95?% CI 1.09–1.23, p?0.001) in patients who received low-dose steroids compared to those who did not. There was still an association with increased adjusted hospital mortality with low-dose steroids even if they were prescribed within 8?h (OR 1.23, 95?% CI 1.13–1.34, p?0.001). Conclusions Steroids were commonly administered in the treatment of septic shock in this subset analysis of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign database. However, this was associated with an increase in adjusted hospital mortality. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|