Medical malpractice: managing the risk

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This is an attempt to present an analysis of the literature examining objective information concerning the likelihood of medicolegal errors as it applies to current medical practice. Hopefully this information will be synthesized to generate a cogent approach to manage risk in emergency medicine. METHODS: Articles were obtained by an English language search of MEDLINE from January 1976 to July 2003. This computerized search was supplemented with literature from the author's personal medicolegal collection of peer review articles. This information was presented in a qualitative fashion. RESULTS: There was a steady increase in both the incidence and the recovery amount of verdicts involving general malpractice litigation. There are clearly high-risk emergency medicine categories responsible for most malpractice events, involving such commonly encountered conditions such as chest pain, abdominal pain, pediatric fever, central nervous system (CNS) bleeding, and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Interestingly, there is a second peak of more minor emergencies, specifically wounds with neglected foreign bodies and missed fractures. Clearly, the largest dollar amount recovery still involves chest pain with subsequent missed transmural myocardial infarction (MI). Interestingly, there does not appear to be a strong correlation between adverse events, outcome and medicolegal risk. Likewise, there does not appear to be a strong correlation between socioeconomic status and a propensity to sue, but there were some defined links with physician profiles involving past malpractice history, as well as prior adverse relationships or communication skills to subsequent claims. Interestingly, a significant association appears to be advertising placed by local law offices seeking to provide services. Lastly in the emergency medical services (EMS) realm, the single strongest correlate to malpractice was the likelihood of an ambulance accident and not related to care delivered itself. CONCLUSION: The current emergency medicine medicolegal dilemmas are a complex interaction of both patient and physician factors specifically targeting several disease categories and damage claims. Awareness of these issues can help to minimize subsequent medicolegal risk and improve patient care.