首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Hyaluronan-Irinotecan improves progression-free survival in 5-fluorouracil refractory patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II trial
Authors:Peter Gibbs  Philip R Clingan  Vinod Ganju  Andrew H Strickland  Shirley S Wong  Niall C Tebbutt  Craig R Underhill  Richard M Fox  Steven P Clavant  Jenny Leung  Minh Pho  Tracey J Brown
Institution:1. Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
2. Southern Medical Day Care, Department of Medical Oncology, University of New South Wales, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
3. Department of Oncology, Frankston Hospital, Frankston, VIC, Australia
4. Department of Oncology, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC, Australia
5. Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Western General Hospital, Footscray, VIC, Australia
6. Ludwig Oncology Unit, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
7. Border Medical Oncology, Albury-Wodonga, NSW, Australia
8. Laboratory for Hyaluronan Research, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Melbourne, 3800, Australia
9. Alchemia Oncology Limited, 737 Burwood Rd, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia
Abstract:

Purpose

The objective of this study was to conduct a randomised phase II study in second-line metastatic colorectal cancer with the purpose of confirming preliminary clinical data indicating that the formulation of irinotecan with the drug carrier, hyaluronan (HA) reduced toxicity of the drug.

Methods

Irinotecan-na?ve patients were randomized to receive either irinotecan (350?mg/m2) or HA-Irinotecan (HA 1,000?mg/m2 and irinotecan at 350?mg/m2) every 3?weeks for a maximum of eight cycles.

Results

Seventy-six patients (41 HA-Irinotecan and 35 irinotecan-alone) were enrolled. There was no significant difference in any individual, or overall, grade 3 or 4 toxicity. There was a trend for increased diarrhea in the HA-Irinotecan-treated patients (20 versus 9%; P?=?21), potentially explained by a disproportionate number of baseline toxicity-associated risk factors in this treatment group. The median number of cycles completed was six for HA-Irinotecan patients and two for irinotecan-alone patients (P?=?0.005). When compared to the control arm, HA-Irinotecan patients had a significantly longer median progression-free survival of 5.2 versus 2.4?months (P?=?0.017) and time to treatment failure (4 vs. 1.8?months; P?=?0.007). Median overall survival was 10.1?months for HA-Irinotecan compared to 8.0?months for irinotecan patients (P?=?0.196).

Conclusion

Further studies are required to define the safety of the formulation of irinotecan with HA. While this study was not adequately powered to demonstrate survival differences, these phase II data indicated HA-Irinotecan to be a promising therapy demonstrating improved efficacy compared to irinotecan-alone.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号