The relationship between left ventricular function assessed by multigated radionuclide test and cardiopulmonary exercise test in patients with ischemic heart disease |
| |
Authors: | Klainman Eliezer Fink Gershon Lebzelter Joseph Krelbaumm Tali Kramer Mordechai R |
| |
Affiliation: | Institute of Pulmonary Medicine, Exercise Physiology Unit, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tiqva. |
| |
Abstract: | STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the oxygen pulse curve (O(2)P-C) as measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) with left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) rest-exercise response as measured by multigated equilibrium (99m)Tc radionuclide cineangiography (MUGA) in patients with different degrees of ischemic heart disease (IHD). PATIENTS: Forty-six patients (39 men and 7 women; mean plus minus 1 SD age, 59.2 plus minus 11 years) with IHD, with no hypertrophic, valvular, or pericardial disease. METHODS: A supine bicycle ergometer with increments of 25 W every 2 min was used for MUGA, and an electronically braked cycle ergometer was used for upright symptoms-limited CPET. Exercise was increased by 10 to 20 W/min until the target heart rate (HR) was reached (similar peak HR for both studies). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The O(2)P-C was scored on a 10-point scale as follows: type A, normal curve (10 points); type B, normal-shaped curve with low values (8 points); type C, low and flat curve (5 points); type D, descending curve (3 points). Findings for the MUGA study were classified into four groups by the degree of ischemic response: group 1 (control), normal diastolic function (n = 10), LVEF > 55%, LVEF during exercise minus LVEF at rest [DeltaLVEF] greater-than-or-equal 5%; group 2, mild ischemia (n = 10), LVEF > 55%, < 0 DeltaLVEF < 5%, diastolic dysfunction at exercise (prominent "A" waves); group 3, LV dysfunction (n = 9), LVEF < or = 35% at rest; and group 4, significant ischemia (n = 17), LVEF > 55%, DeltaLVEF < 0, diastolic dysfunction. A highly significant relationship between the O(2)P-C score and the MUGA grouping was observed by Fisher's Exact Test and Pearson's linear regression line (p < 0.001; R = - 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Exercise-responded O(2)P-C might serve as a good noninvasive, physiologically based, parameter to distinguish between IHD patients with normal and impaired LV function. |
| |
Keywords: | cardiopulmonary exercise test coronary artery disease left ventricular ejection fraction multigated equilibrium radionuclide cineangiography oxygen pulse CAD" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" cekeyw70" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" coronary artery disease CPET" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" cekeyw90" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" cardiopulmonary exercise testing EDV" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" cekeyw110" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" end-diastolic volume HR" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" cekeyw130" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" heart rate IHD" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" cekeyw150" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" ischemic heart disease LV" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" cekeyw170" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" left ventricular LVEF" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" cekeyw190" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" left ventricular ejection fraction ΔLVEF" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" cekeyw210" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" left ventricular ejection fraction during exercise minus left ventricular ejection fraction at rest MUGA" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" cekeyw230" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," $$" :[{" #name" :" __text__" ," _" :" multigated equilibrium " },{" #name" :" sup" ," $" :{" loc" :" post" }," _" :" 99m" },{" #name" :" __text__" ," _" :" Tc radionuclide cineangiography oxygen pulse oxygen pulse curve SV" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" cekeyw290" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" stroke volume oxygen consumption |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|