首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Methylphenidate effects in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: electrodermal and ERP measures during a continuous performance task
Authors:Carlie?A.?Lawrence,Robert?J.?Barry  author-information"  >  author-information__contact u-icon-before"  >  mailto:robert_barry@uow.edu.au"   title="  robert_barry@uow.edu.au"   itemprop="  email"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  Email author"   data-track-label="  "  >Email author,Adam?R.?Clarke,Stuart?J.?Johnstone,Rory?McCarthy,Mark?Selikowitz,Samantha?J.?Broyd
Affiliation:(1) Department of Psychology and Brain & Behaviour Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, 2522, Australia;(2) Sydney Developmental Clinic, Sydney, Australia
Abstract:Rationale Previous research investigating the effects of stimulants, such as methylphenidate (MPH), on children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD) has rarely included autonomic measures of arousal.Objective Our aim was to clarify the effects of MPH on central and autonomic measures in AD/HD children during a continuous performance task (CPT) using a naturalistic open-label study.Method Thirty-six boys (18 AD/HD and 18 control) participated in a CPT over two trial periods, allowing a more valid estimate of the effects of medication, rather than assuming that retesting per se has no substantial impact. MPH was administered to the AD/HD group 1 h prior to the second trial. Errors and reaction time (RT) were recorded as measures of performance, electrodermal activity as an autonomic nervous system measure and event-related potentials (ERPs) as an index of central nervous system activity.Results AD/HD children made more errors than controls in the first session, but no group differences were found after medication. No significant differences were observed for RT. Skin conductance level was found to be lower in AD/HD children than controls, but this difference was also ameliorated after medication. Conversely, mean skin conductance response to target stimuli was found not to differ between groups during the initial test phase but became significantly different in phase 2. ERP data showed topographic differences between groups in N1, P2, N2 and P3 at the initial test phase, which were reduced at the second test.Conclusion Stimulant medication ameliorated some of the dysfunctions in AD/HD children, which are reflected in behavioural and ERP measures. These results, in combination with general differences in electrodermal activity, support a hypoarousal model of AD/HD, which can explain the action of MPH in these children.
Keywords:AD/HD  Stimulants  Event-related potentials  Skin conductance  CPT  Boys  Children  Hypoarousal
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号