首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于TOPSIS法与RSR法模糊联合法的广西村卫生室服务能力综合评价
引用本文:黄丹琪,冯启明,高洪达. 基于TOPSIS法与RSR法模糊联合法的广西村卫生室服务能力综合评价[J]. 现代预防医学, 2022, 0(21): 3937-3943. DOI: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202203532
作者姓名:黄丹琪  冯启明  高洪达
作者单位:广西医科大学卫生与健康政策研究中心,广西 南宁 530021
摘    要:目的 综合评价广西村卫生室服务能力,为提高村卫生室服务提供参考依据。方法 从人力、财力、物力、服务功能四个维度构建广西村卫生室服务能力评价指标体系,采用TOPSIS法、RSR法以及两者模糊联合法对2020年广西各地市村卫生室服务能力进行综合评价并分档。结果 评价指标由4个一级指标和16个二级指标构成,有10个指标数据呈上升趋势。在TOPSIS法和RSR法两者模糊联合法的分析中,计算出的南宁市Ci值、RSRi值、0.1Ci+0.9RSRi值、0.5Ci+0.5RSRi值和0.9Ci+0.1RSRi值分别为0.5587、0.7500、0.7309、0.6543和0.5778,排名均在第一位。结论 广西村卫生室卫生服务趋势向好,地市间村卫生室服务能力不均衡,综合评价方法的科学性较强。

关 键 词:TOPSIS法  RSR法  模糊联合  村卫生室  服务能力

Comprehensive evaluation of village clinic service capacity in Guangxi based on TOPSIS and RSR with fuzzy combined method
HUANG Dan-qi,FENG Qi-ming,GAO Hong-da. Comprehensive evaluation of village clinic service capacity in Guangxi based on TOPSIS and RSR with fuzzy combined method[J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2022, 0(21): 3937-3943. DOI: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202203532
Authors:HUANG Dan-qi  FENG Qi-ming  GAO Hong-da
Affiliation:Health Policy Research Centre, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530021, China
Abstract:Objective To comprehensively evaluate the service capacity of Guangxi village clinics, and to provide reference for improving village clinic services. Methods From the four dimensions of human resources, financial resources, material resources and service functions, an evaluation index system for the service capability of Guangxi village clinics was constructed, and the TOPSIS method, RSR method and the fuzzy combination method of the two were used to comprehensively evaluate and archive the service capabilities of urban and village clinics in Guangxi in 2020. Results The evaluation indicators consisted of 4 first-level indicators and 16 second-level indicators, of which 10 indicators showed an upward trend. In the analysis of fuzzy combination method of TOPSIS and RSR method, the calculated value of Ci, RSRi, 0.1Ci+0.9RSRi, 0.5Ci+0.5RSRi and 0.9Ci+0.1RSRi of Nanning were 0.5587, 0.7500, 0.7309, 0.6543 and 0.5778, respectively ranking first. Conclusion The health service trend of Guangxi village clinics is good, but the service capacity of village clinics between cities and regions is unbalanced. The comprehensive evaluation method is scientific.
Keywords:TOPSIS method  RSR method  Fuzzy union  Village clinic  Service capacity
点击此处可从《现代预防医学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《现代预防医学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号