首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

区域健康老龄化促进指数的构建研究
引用本文:殷召雪,朱晓磊,高欣,张晓畅,刘意,吴静.区域健康老龄化促进指数的构建研究[J].中华流行病学杂志,2021,42(12):2196-2200.
作者姓名:殷召雪  朱晓磊  高欣  张晓畅  刘意  吴静
作者单位:中国疾病预防控制中心慢病和老龄健康管理处, 北京 102206;中国疾病预防控制中心慢病和老龄健康管理处, 北京 102206;湖南省疾病预防控制中心, 长沙 410000;中国疾病预防控制中心慢性非传染性疾病预防控制中心, 北京 100050
基金项目:国家重点研发计划(2020YFC2003000)
摘    要:目的 建立一个可以反映区域健康老龄化促进状况的指数。方法 利用专家咨询法构建指标体系,并利用层次分析法为各指标赋予权重,最终形成区域健康老龄化促进指数。结果 本研究建立了包括由人居环境、医疗服务、公共卫生、护理养老和保障体系5个一级指标和21个二级指标构成的区域健康老龄化促进指标体系。所构建的指标体系中,一级指标权重范围为0.073~0.346,其中人居环境和公共卫生的权重最大,分别为0.346和0.325,护理养老权重最小(0.073)。所有二级指标在整个指标体系中的综合权重范围为0.011~0.162。所有指标层次总排序的一致性比例为0.021,一致性检验合格。结论 本研究构建的区域健康老龄化促进指数具备较强的科学性、合理性,具有较好的适用性,可以用于区域健康老龄化促进状况的评估。

关 键 词:健康老龄化  指数  层次分析法
收稿时间:2021/4/25 0:00:00

Study on the establishment of regional healthy aging promotion index
Yin Zhaoxue,Zhu Xiaolei,Gao Xin,Zhang Xiaochang,Liu Yi,Wu Jing.Study on the establishment of regional healthy aging promotion index[J].Chinese Journal of Epidemiology,2021,42(12):2196-2200.
Authors:Yin Zhaoxue  Zhu Xiaolei  Gao Xin  Zhang Xiaochang  Liu Yi  Wu Jing
Institution:Division of Non-communicable Diseases and Elderly Health Management, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China;Division of Non-communicable Diseases and Elderly Health Management, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China;Hunan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changsha 410000, China; National Center for Chronic and Non-communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China
Abstract:Objective To establish an index that can reflect the level of healthy aging promotion in a region. Methods Establish an indicators system using expert consultation and then determine the weight for each indicator using the analytic hierarchy process. Finally, we can get the regional healthy aging promotion index. Results Regional healthy aging promotion indicator system was established, including five first-level indicators (residence environment, medical service, public health, nurse and care, and supporting system) and 21 second-level indicators. The weight of every level-one indicator ranges from 0.073 to 0.346. Two indicators with the highest weight are residence environment and public health (0.346 and 0.325, respectively), while the indicator with the lowest weight is nurse and care (0.073). The importance of every level-two indicator ranges from 0.011 to 0.162. The consistency ratio of the regional healthy aging promotion index is 0.021, and the consistency test is qualified. Conclusion Regional healthy aging promotion index established in this study is very scientific, reasonable, and applicable. It can be used to evaluate the region''s situation or level of healthy aging promotion.
Keywords:Healthy aging  Index  Analytic hierarchy process
点击此处可从《中华流行病学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华流行病学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号