Distinct Physiologic and Inflammatory Responses Elicited in Baboons after Challenge with Shiga Toxin Type 1 or 2 from Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli is a principal source of regional outbreaks of bloody diarrhea and hemolytic-uremic syndrome in the United States and worldwide. Primary bacterial virulence factors are Shiga toxin types 1 and 2 (Stx1 and Stx2), and we performed parallel analyses of the pathophysiologies elicited by the toxins in nonhuman primate models to identify shared and unique consequences of the toxemias. After a single intravenous challenge with purified Stx1 or Stx2, baboons (Papio) developed thrombocytopenia, anemia, and acute renal failure with loss of glomerular function, in a dose-dependent manner. Differences in the timing and magnitude of physiologic responses were observed between the toxins. The animals were more sensitive to Stx2, with mortality at lower doses, but Stx2-induced renal injury and mortality were delayed 2 to 3 days compared to those after Stx1 challenge. Multiplex analyses of plasma inflammatory cytokines revealed similarities (macrophage chemoattractant protein 1 MCP-1] and tumor necrosis factor alpha TNF-α]) and differences (interleukin-6 IL-6] and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor G-CSF]) elicited by the toxins with respect to the mediator induced and timing of the responses. Neither toxin induced detectable levels of plasma TNF-α. To our knowledge, this is the first time that the in vivo consequences of the toxins have been compared in a parallel and reproducible manner in nonhuman primates, and the data show similarities to patient observations. The availability of experimental nonhuman primate models for Stx toxemias provides a reproducible platform for testing antitoxin compounds and immunotherapeutics with outcome criteria that have clinical meaning.Infection with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) results in intestinal cramps and bloody diarrhea, followed 5 to 12 days later in some patients by the development of hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) (16, 18). HUS is characterized clinically by the triad of thrombocytopenia, hemolytic microangiopathy, and renal injury and is the leading cause of acute renal failure in otherwise healthy children in the United States. An antibiotic regimen is not recommended, and treatment options are limited to critical care support (47). Patients with diarrhea-associated HUS can have long-term renal impairment of varying severity, and approximately one-fourth of patients have neurologic sequelae, including seizures, coma/stupor, cortical blindness, ataxia, and paraplegia (10, 14).The natural infection route is gastrointestinal, via contaminated food or water. The bacteria colonize the intestinal lumen, with most strains forming characteristic attaching-and-effacing lesions, and the organisms may synthesize and release one or more toxins that are primary virulence factors contributing to the clinical manifestations of HUS (19). The toxins are AB₅ holotoxins, referred to as Shiga toxins due to their functional and structural similarities to Shiga toxin expressed by Shigella dysenteriae serotype 1 (4). Shiga toxin type 1 (Stx1) is essentially identical to the Shigella toxin (4), differing by one amino acid, but shares only 58% amino acid identity with Shiga toxin type 2 (Stx2). Stx1 and Stx2 have distinct spatial conformations (8) and dissociation rates from receptor-lipid surfaces (24). STEC strains may secrete one or both toxins and several toxin variants, and clinical studies have demonstrated that HUS is most often associated with the expression of Stx2 (3), particularly following infection with E. coli O157:H7 strains (12, 20). All Shiga toxins share a cellular intoxication mechanism in which B subunits oligomerize into pentamers for interaction with a cell surface globotriaosylceramide Gb₃ (CD77) receptor. Following binding, holotoxins are internalized via clathrin-dependent or clathrin-independent mechanisms and undergo retrograde transport through the trans-Golgi network and Golgi apparatus to reach the endoplasmic reticulum (33, 46). During transport, the A subunit undergoes limited proteolysis, and once in the endoplasmic reticulum, a fragment of the A subunit translocates into the cytoplasm, where its N-glycosidase activity inactivates the 28S rRNA component of eukaryotic ribosomes to inhibit protein synthesis and cause cell death (25, 43).While Stx1 and Stx2 share many characteristics, they are not identical and there is evidence that toxin-specific activities may be clinically relevant. Both toxins are internalized after binding to Gb₃, but the mechanisms of their intracellular trafficking through polarized intestinal epithelial cells to reach the intestinal endothelium are very different (15). Also, endothelial sensitivities to Stx1 and Stx2 differ depending on the vascular bed, with intestinal endothelium being more sensitive to the Shiga toxins than saphenous vein endothelium (12), and glomerular endothelial cells are about 1,000 times more sensitive to Stx2 than human umbilical vein endothelial cells (17). The mechanisms for these differences are not completely understood but may be related to receptor density, toxin effects on endoplasmic reticulum stress responses and apoptosis (22, 41), or local availability of sensitizing cytokines (5, 7, 11).Most animal models show greater sensitivity to Stx2, including murine, rabbit, and gnotobiotic piglet models, although renal and neurologic micropathologies differ from those in humans and between animal species (6, 9, 45). Earlier studies with the baboon (Papio) model showed that a bolus infusion of purified Stx1 induced intestinal injury, kidney glomerular injury, microangiopathic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neurologic abnormalities similar to those in humans, suggesting that the baboon represents a promising preclinical animal model (44). A systemic inflammatory response was minimal after Stx1 challenge, but urinary tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels were consistent with local kidney inflammatory responses. Baboons were also more sensitive to Stx2 (38), but a direct comparison of the pathophysiologies elicited by the two toxins was difficult because of differing experimental designs. We sought to expand these earlier studies of baboons to identify similarities and differences elicited by Stx1 and Stx2 under reproducible experimental conditions. Given the clinical relevance of Stx2 production during STEC infection in patients, we were particularly interested in responses after Stx2 challenge, for which few data are available from the baboon model. We present the metabolic, physiologic, and inflammatory responses in baboons after intravenous challenge with Stx1 or Stx2. The observed differences in pathophysiology elicited by the two toxins may contribute to a better understanding of the differences in clinical manifestations produced by the toxins.