首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

浙江省43家公共场所被动吸烟调查分析
引用本文:徐越,张新卫,郭俊香,曹承建,王凤英,胡丹标,俞锋,王俊艳,应娇红.浙江省43家公共场所被动吸烟调查分析[J].中国健康教育,2008,24(9):690-692.
作者姓名:徐越  张新卫  郭俊香  曹承建  王凤英  胡丹标  俞锋  王俊艳  应娇红
作者单位:1. 浙江省疾病预防控制中心,浙江,杭州,310051
2. 浙江省公共卫生工委员会,浙江,杭州310009
3. 杭州市疾病预防控制中心,浙江,杭州,310006
4. 金华市疾病预防控制中心,浙江,金华,321000
5. 宁海县疾病预防控制中心,浙江,宁海,315600
基金项目:中央补助地方草控制项目
摘    要:目的了解浙江省公共场所被动吸烟现况,为制定浙江省被动吸烟控烟政策提供依据。方法采用现场观察法,收集全省车站等候室、商场、医院、学校、疾病预防控制机构、政府对外办公楼等场所共6类43家公共场所禁烟的情况,并采用拦截式调查方法问卷调查629名成年人,了解其被动吸烟的相关信息。结果34.88%的公共场所为禁烟场所,16.28%的公共场所划分了无烟区。成人烟草烟雾的接触情况是:67.24%的被调查者为被动吸烟者,77.42%的被调查者家庭室内可以吸烟,76.47%的人报告常去的娱乐场所室内可以吸烟,62.17%的人报告工作场所室内可以吸烟。在支持公共场所禁烟方面,89.51%的人支持在公共交通工具上禁烟,88.71%的人支持在学校里禁烟,83.15%的人支持在医院里禁烟,92.53%的人支持在办公室全部或者部分禁烟,79.33%的人支持在餐厅全部或者部分禁烟,61.37%的人支持在酒吧全部或者部分禁烟。单因素分析结果表明,非吸烟者、高学历者、对被动吸烟的危害有认知的人更加支持餐厅禁烟,OR值分别是2.689、1.393和2.670。结论浙江省公共场所被动吸烟情况比较严重,群众普遍支持在公共场所开展禁烟工作。

关 键 词:公共场所  吸烟  被动吸烟

Analysis on secondhand smoke exposure survey in 43 public places of Zhejiang Province
Xu Yue,Zhang Xin-wei,Guo Jun-xiang,Cao Cheng-jian,Wang Feng-ying,Hu Dan-biao,Yu Feng,Wang Jun-yan,Ying Jiao-hong.Analysis on secondhand smoke exposure survey in 43 public places of Zhejiang Province[J].Chinese Journal of Health Education,2008,24(9):690-692.
Authors:Xu Yue  Zhang Xin-wei  Guo Jun-xiang  Cao Cheng-jian  Wang Feng-ying  Hu Dan-biao  Yu Feng  Wang Jun-yan  Ying Jiao-hong
Institution:Xu Yue, Zhang Xin- wei, Guo Jun-xiang, Cao Cheng-jian, Wang Feng-ying, Hu Dan-biao, Yu Feng, Wang Jun-yan, Ying Jiao-hong.( Zhejiang Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou 310051, China )
Abstract:Objective To estimate the status of secondhand smoke exposure in public places of Zhejiang Province and to provide evidence for taking effective and proper policies on smoking prevention in local areas. Methods The information of secondhand smoke exposure in 43 public places (including waiting rooms, shops, hospitals, schools, CDC, government office buildings and so on) were collected by field observation method and 629 adults from these places were selected for face-to-face interview. Results 34. 88% public places were smoke-free and 16. 28% places had smoke-free areas. The general passive smoking rate was 67. 24%. The main passive smoking places were household (77.42%), entertainment venues (76.47%) , and workplace (62. 17% ). The public places in which most people supported having a ban on smoking were public transportations (89. 51% ), schools (88. 71% ), hospitals (83.15%). Most people supported to set up smoke-free areas in workplace (92. 53% ), restaurants (79. 33% ) and bars (61.37%). Non - smoking, high education background and people who knew the harmful results of secondhand smoke exposure were the supporting factors and the odds ratios were 2. 689, 1. 393 and 2. 670 respectively. Conclusion The masses have seriously suffered from secondhand smoke and most of them support having a ban on smoking in public places.
Keywords:Public places  Tobacco using  Secondhand smoke (SHS)
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号