首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

甘肃道地药材红芪与炙红芪指纹图谱对比研究
引用本文:李越峰,牛江涛,曹瑞,司昕蕾,边甜甜,辛二旦,张爱霞,严兴科.甘肃道地药材红芪与炙红芪指纹图谱对比研究[J].中国医院药学杂志,2019,39(16):1634-1638.
作者姓名:李越峰  牛江涛  曹瑞  司昕蕾  边甜甜  辛二旦  张爱霞  严兴科
作者单位:1. 甘肃中医药大学药学院, 甘肃 兰州 730000; 2. 甘肃省中药质量与标准研究重点实验室, 甘肃 兰州 730000
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(81460611);自然科学基金创新基地和人才计划项目(18JR3RA197);甘肃省中药质量与标准研究重点实验室开放基金(ZYZL18-008)
摘    要:目的:建立红芪与炙红芪指纹图谱,比较红芪蜜炙前后指纹图谱差异。方法:采用HPLC色谱技术绘制红芪与炙红芪醇提液指纹图谱,利用相似度软件分析红芪与炙红芪指纹图谱差异。HPLC色谱条件如下:色谱柱:Agilent HC-C18色谱柱(4.6 mm×250 mm,5 μm);流动相为乙腈-0.01%磷酸水溶液。流速:1.0 mL·min-1;检测波长:280 nm;柱温:30 ℃;进样量10 μL。梯度洗脱程序:0~5 min,乙腈2%~5%;5~20 min,乙腈5%~16%;20~35 min,乙腈16%~18%;35~36 min,乙腈18%~30%;36~66 min,乙腈30%~60%;66~80 min,乙腈60%~90%。结果:红芪与炙红芪甲醇提取液指纹图谱中有19个共有峰,除1,4,6,18,19号峰外,其余共有峰峰面积具有显著性差异。与红芪组相比,炙红芪组9号和2,3,8,10,11,16,17号共有峰峰面积均显著增加,P<0.05和P<0.01。5,7,12,13,14,15号共有峰峰面积显著减少,P<0.01。其中16号峰为毛蕊异黄酮,17号峰为芒柄花素;20号和21号峰为炙红芪组新出现的色谱峰。结论:红芪与炙红芪醇提液指纹图谱存在差异,红芪蜜炙前后化学成分存在量与质的差异,表明蜜炙过程对红芪中化学成分影响显著,可以采用指纹图谱对红芪与炙红芪做鉴别和质量控制。

关 键 词:红芪  炙红芪  高效液相色谱  指纹图谱  对比分析  
收稿时间:2019-02-14

Comparativestudy on fingerprint of Hedysari Radix and honey-processed Hedysari Radix in Gansu province
LI Yue-feng,NIU Jiang-tao,CAO Rui,SI Xin-lei,BIAN Tian-tian,XIN Er-dan,ZHANG Ai-xia,YAN Xing-ke.Comparativestudy on fingerprint of Hedysari Radix and honey-processed Hedysari Radix in Gansu province[J].Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy,2019,39(16):1634-1638.
Authors:LI Yue-feng  NIU Jiang-tao  CAO Rui  SI Xin-lei  BIAN Tian-tian  XIN Er-dan  ZHANG Ai-xia  YAN Xing-ke
Institution:1. Pharmacy of College, Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM), Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Quality and Standard of TCM of Gansu Province, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To establish the fingerprint of Hedysari Radix and honey-processed Hedysari Radix and compare the difference of fingerprint before and after Hedysari Radix-based honey processing. METHODS The HPLC chromatographic technique was used to draw the fingerprint of the methanol extract of Hedysari Radix and honey-processed Hedysari Radix, and the similarity software was used to analyze the difference between the fingerprint of Hedysari Radix and honey-processed Hedysari Radix. The chromatographic conditions were as follows:column:Agilent HC-C18 column (4. 6 mm×250 mm, 5 μm); The mobile phase is acetonitrile-0.01% phosphoric acid solution. The flow rate was 1:1.0 ml·min-1; The detection wavelength was 1:280 nm;the column temperature was 30℃, and the injection amount was 10 μL. The gradient elution procedure:0-5 min, acetonitrile 2%-5%; 5-20 min, acetonitrile 5%-16%; 20-35 min, acetonitrile 16%-18%; 35-36 min, acetonitrile 18%-30%; 36-66 min, acetonitrile 30%-60%; 66-80 min, acetonitrile 60%-90%. RESULTS There were 19 common peaks in the fingerprints of methanol extract of Hedysari Radix and honey-processed Hedysari Radix, except for the peaks of 1, 4, 6, 18 and 19, and there were significant differences in the area of the other common peaks. Compared with Hedysari Radix, the common peak areas of 9, 2, 3, 8, 10, 11, 16, and 17 in the honey-processed Hedysari Radix group were significantly increased ((P<0.05 and P<0.01). The peak areas of common peaks 5, 7, 12, 13, 14, and 15 were significantly reduced (P<0.01) Among them, 16 was isoflavone, 17 was amaranthin, and 20 and 21 were the new chromatographic peaks in Hedysari Radix group. CCONCLUSION There was a difference in quantity and quality between the fingerprints of methanol extract of Hedysari Radix and honey-processed Hedysari Radix, which indicated that the process of honey cooking has a significant effect on the chemical components of Hedysari Radix. The fingerprints can be used to identify and control the quality of Hedysari Radix and honey-processed Hedysari Radix.
Keywords:Hedysari Radix  honey-processed Hedysari Radix  high performance liquid chromatography  fingerprint  comparative analysis  
点击此处可从《中国医院药学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国医院药学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号