首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

利巴韦林含片的人体药动学及生物等效性研究
引用本文:罗晨辉,陈笑艳,孙玉明,于华玲,蒋云,仇宇,钟大放,周晓,刘亚利.利巴韦林含片的人体药动学及生物等效性研究[J].中国临床药理学与治疗学,2008,13(2):169-173.
作者姓名:罗晨辉  陈笑艳  孙玉明  于华玲  蒋云  仇宇  钟大放  周晓  刘亚利
作者单位:1. 湖南省肿瘤医院临床药理基地,长沙,410013,湖南
2. 沈阳药科大学药物代谢与药物动力学实验室,沈阳,110016,辽宁
摘    要:目的:建立人血浆中利巴韦林的HPLC—MS分析方法,用以测定18名健康男性受试者舌下含服不同厂家的利巴韦林含片后的血药浓度。估算受试制剂和参比制剂的药动学参数,评价两种制剂是否生物等效。方法:采用双周期随机交叉试验设计。分别给予18名男性健康受试者试验制剂或参比制剂80峭,采集静脉血样,血浆样品去蛋白后用HPLC/MS/MS法检测药物浓度。计算药动学参数,判定两制剂是否生物等效。结果:测定利巴韦林的线性范围为2~500ng/mL(r^2为0,9944),平均回收率〉90%,日内RSD和日间RSD均〈10%。测得血浆中两种制剂的利巴韦林的主要药代动力学参数tmax、Cmax、t1/2、AUC0-72和AUG0→∞分别为:(1.1±0.5)、(1.1±0.4)h,(249±89)、(232±65)ng/mL,(34±11)、(34±11)h,(2828±1215)、(2685±1096)ng·h·mL^-1,(3600±1568)、(3416±1379)ng·h·mL^-1。以AUC0-72计算。利巴韦林含片的相对生物利用度平均为(106±16)%。结论:本方法更简便、准确,灵敏度得到很大提高。两种制剂的利巴韦林药代动力学参数无统计学差异,具有生物等效性。

关 键 词:利巴韦林  药动学  生物等效性  高效液相串联-色谱质谱联用色谱法
文章编号:1009-2501(2008)02-0169-005
修稿时间:2007年11月17

Bioequivalence and pharmacokinetics of ribavirin buccal tablets in healthy volunteers
LUO Chen-hui,CHEN Xiao-yan,SUN Yu-ming,YU Hua-ling,JIANG Yun,QIU Yu,ZHONG Da-fang,ZHOU Xiao,LIU Ya-li.Bioequivalence and pharmacokinetics of ribavirin buccal tablets in healthy volunteers[J].Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics,2008,13(2):169-173.
Authors:LUO Chen-hui  CHEN Xiao-yan  SUN Yu-ming  YU Hua-ling  JIANG Yun  QIU Yu  ZHONG Da-fang  ZHOU Xiao  LIU Ya-li
Institution:LUO Chen-hui, CHEN Xiao-yan, SUN Yu-ming, YU Hua-ling, JIANG Yun, QIU Yu, ZHONG Da-fang, ZHOU Xiao, LIU Ya-li( 1Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Tumor Hospital of Hunan Province, Changsha 410013, Hunan, China; Laboratory of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110015, Liaoning, China)
Abstract:AIM: To determine ribavirin in human plasma by an LC/MS/MS method and to study the bioequivalence and pharmacokineties of reference and test ribavirin formulations. METHODS: A double-phased stochastieal crossover study design was conducted. 18 healthy volunteers were given a single dose of 80 mg ribavirin of reference and test formulations. The drug was extracted from collected plasma and analyzed by LG/MS/MS. The phannaeokinetie parameters as well as relative bioavailability were measured. RESULTS: The calibration curve was linear within the range of 2 - 500 ng/mL ( r^2 = 0.9944). The average recovery was more than 90%. The average RSD within 3 days and between 3 days were all less than 10%. The major pharmacokinetic parameters tmax, Cmax, t1/2, AUC0-72 and AUC0→∞of reference and test ribavirin formulations were (1.1±0.5) and (1.1 ±0.4) h, (249±89) and (232±65) ng/mL, (34±11) and (34±11) h, (2828 ± 1215) and (2685 ± 1096) ng·h·mL^-1, (3600 ±1568)and (3416±1379)ng·h·mL^-1 The relative bioavailability of test bueeal tablet was( 106 ± 16)%. CONCLUSION: The method is more simple, more accurate and much more sensitive. There is no significant difference between the main pharmaeokinetie parmeters of two formulations of ribavirin ( P 〉 0.05), they are bioequivalent.
Keywords:ribavirin  pharmaeokineties  bioequiavailability  LC-MS/MS
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号