首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

宫颈细胞学不典型腺细胞的临床分析与管理
引用本文:王秋曦,宋学红,刘军. 宫颈细胞学不典型腺细胞的临床分析与管理[J]. 中国误诊学杂志, 2008, 8(6): 1268-1271
作者姓名:王秋曦  宋学红  刘军
作者单位:首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院妇产科,北京,100020
摘    要:目的:探讨宫颈细胞学诊断中的不典型腺上皮细胞(Atypical glandular cells,AGC)适宜的临床管理方法。方法:采用前瞻性自身对照方法,选择2002—03/2004—10我院阴道镜门诊就诊的65例宫颈细胞学AGC患者,分析其阴道镜检查、宫颈活检、子宫分段诊刮和宫颈LEEP术的组织学结果及随访时间6~31个月,中位随访时间12个月的结果。结果:细胞学检查共51462例,AGC152例,检出率0.295%,其中接受阴道镜检查和组织学确诊者65例。(1)阴道镜检查结果:正常转化区30例(46.15%);上皮内低度病变者30例(46.15%);移行带上移阴道镜检查不满意者3例(4.62%);图像显示宫颈浸润癌2例(3.08%)。(2)组织病理学结果:47例(72.31%)慢性宫颈炎;15例(23.08%)宫颈上皮内瘤变1级(Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,CIN),合并尖锐湿疣6例,6例(9.23%)为腺上皮轻度不典型增生(CGIN1);1例CIN2;1例(1.54%)宫颈鳞癌;1例(1.54%)子宫内膜腺癌。(3)随访结果:除外2例癌患者,余63例均行随访,随访率100%。慢性宫颈炎60例(95.24%)、2例CIN1(与活检CIN1为同患者)、1例LEEP病理由原活检CIN1进展为CIN2。结论:AGC是一个重要的细胞学诊断提示,因有宫颈癌前期病变、宫颈癌和子宫内膜癌的存在,需用组织学评价其临床意义,包括用阴道镜指引下的宫颈活检术、分段诊刮术和宫颈LEEP术。随访是临床工作中不容忽视的重要环节。

关 键 词:宫颈肿瘤/病理学  上皮细胞/病理学  人类  女(雌)性
文章编号:1009-6647(2008)06-1268-04
修稿时间:2007-07-12

Clinical Consideration in Analysis and Management on Atypical Glandular Cells of Cervical Cytology
WANG Qiu-xi,SONG Xue-hong,LIU Jun. Clinical Consideration in Analysis and Management on Atypical Glandular Cells of Cervical Cytology[J]. Chinese Journal of Misdiagnostics, 2008, 8(6): 1268-1271
Authors:WANG Qiu-xi  SONG Xue-hong  LIU Jun
Affiliation:(Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital of Capital University of Medical Science , Beijing 100020 ,China)
Abstract:Objective:To explore the appropriate management for atypical glandular cells (AGC). Methods:To analyzed the histopathologial results of cervix by colposcopic biopsy,dilatation and curettage (D&C),cervical loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP)and the median follow-up time was 12 months(range from 6 to 31 months) prospectively. Results:Of the 51462 cases were examined the cervical papanicolaou smears, 152 cases were diagnosed with AGC, detectable rate was 0. 295 %. Of these, only 65 cases (42.765%) monitored with both colposcopy and histopathology. (1) Colposcopy finding: 30 cases (46. 15%) with showing normal transformation zone 30 (46. 15%) with low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) 3(4.62 %) with unsatisfactory colpcopic findings 2 (3.08%) with invasive cervical carcinoma. (2) The histopathologial results: 47 (72.31%)with cronic cervicitis ;15 (23.08%)with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-gradel (CIN1), including 6 (9.23%) with-human papilloma virus (HPV) infection, 6(9.23%) with cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia-gradel (CGIN1) 1 case (1.54 % ) with CIN2 1 (1.54 % ) with i nvasive cervical cancer 1(1.54%) with endometrial carcinoma. (3) The results of follow-up: 63 successfully collected as: 60 (95.24%) patients with cronic cervicitis,2 with CINl(this result sameness biopsy), 1 case with CIN2. Conclusion:If cytological diagnosis is the AGC,it means this patient may suffere from endometrial carcinoma and cervical cancer or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, so, for AGC, it will be required aggressive evaluation of hisiopathology, including LEEP of cervix, dilatation and curettage, undergoing colposcopic biopsies. Follow-up is very importance for cervical lesions.
Keywords:Cervix Neoplasms/pathology  Epithelial Cells/pathology  Humans  Female
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号