首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

立体定向穿刺引流术治疗少量高血压脑出血临床分析
引用本文:李建,张云峰. 立体定向穿刺引流术治疗少量高血压脑出血临床分析[J]. 安徽医学, 2015, 36(11): 1339-1342. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2015.11.008
作者姓名:李建  张云峰
作者单位:246000,安徽安庆 海军安庆医院神经外科;246000,安徽安庆 海军安庆医院神经外科
摘    要:目的:探讨少量基底节高血压脑出血内科保守治疗与 CT 引导立体定向穿刺引流术预后疗效。方法选取2011年5月至2014年6月收治的72例基底节高血压脑出血患者(出血量20~30 mL),分为保守治疗组和手术治疗组各36例,观察比较两组患者的治疗效果。结果两组患者并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(11.4% vs 22.9%,P >0.05),均无死亡病例。手术治疗组平均血肿消除时间(4.8±1.9)d 明显短于保守治疗组(15.2±4.5)d,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);手术组住院时间(19.6±4.2)d 明显短于保守组(23.3±5.3)d,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。治疗后2周、1个月、3个月的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分两组均明显低于治疗前,且手术组术后2周、1个月的 NIHSS 评分均明显低于保守组,差异均有统计学意义( P <0.05),但3个月后 NIHSS 评分比较,两组差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论立体定向穿刺引流术治疗少量基底节高血压脑出血,创伤小,可以缩短血肿消除时间、减少患者住院时间,促进神经功能早期恢复,临床疗效优于内科保守治疗。

关 键 词:高血压脑出血  基底节  立体定向技术  保守治疗
收稿时间:2015-03-28
修稿时间:2015-08-26

Clinical research on stereotactic puncture and drainage in treatment of small-volume hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage
Li Jian and Zhang Yunfeng. Clinical research on stereotactic puncture and drainage in treatment of small-volume hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage[J]. Anhui Medical Journal, 2015, 36(11): 1339-1342. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2015.11.008
Authors:Li Jian and Zhang Yunfeng
Affiliation:Department of Neurology, Naval Hospital of Anqing, Anqing 246000, China and Department of Neurology, Naval Hospital of Anqing, Anqing 246000, China
Abstract:Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of conservative treatment with CT-guided stereotactic puncture and drain-age in treatment of small-volume hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage. Methods 72 patients with small - volume hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage of basal ganglia ever treated from May 2011 to June 2014 were selected,the bleeding amount being 20 ~ 30 mL,and equally di-vided into operation treatment group and conservative treatment group for their contrast of therapeutic effects. Results No cases died,and no statistically difference were found in the incidence of complications(11. 4% vs 22. 9% ,P > 0. 05)between the two groups. The average he-matoma eliminating time and hospitalization days in the operation treatment group were(4. 8 ± 1. 9)d and(19. 6 ± 4. 2)d,which were both much shorter than those in the conservative treatment group,(15. 2 ± 4. 5)d and(23. 3 ± 5. 3)d,with statistically differences(P < 0. 05). The NIHSS(National Institute of Health stroke scale)scores of the two groups at 2 weeks,1 month or 3 months after treatment were signifi-cantly lower than those before treatment,and the NIHSS scores of the operation treatment group at 2 weeks or 1 month after treatment were significantly lower than those of the conservative treatment group,and the differences between them were statistically significant(P < 0. 05). There was no significant difference in the NIHSS scores at 3 months after treatment between the two groups(P > 0. 05). Conclusion Use of stereotactic puncture and drainage in treatment of small-volume hemorrhage of basal ganglia caused by hypertension is effective to shorten he-matoma eliminating time and hospitalization days,with little injury and better clinical efficacy than conservative treatment,which further pro-motes early rehabilitation of nerve function.
Keywords:Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage  Basal Ganglia  Stereotactic Techniques  Conservative Treatment
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《安徽医学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《安徽医学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号