首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Validation of English version in Singapore
Authors:N.?Luo,C.?S.?L.?Fones,S.?E.?Lim,F.?Xie,J.?Thumboo,S.?C.?Li  author-information"  >  author-information__contact u-icon-before"  >  mailto:phalisc@nus.edu.sg"   title="  phalisc@nus.edu.sg"   itemprop="  email"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  Email author"   data-track-label="  "  >Email author
Affiliation:(1) Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore, 119260, Singapore;(2) Department of Psychological Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore;(3) Department of Hematology–Oncology, National University Hospital, Singapore;(4) Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore;(5) Department of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Abstract:Objective: This study aimed to validate the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30, English version 3.0) in Singaporean cancer patients. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, a heterogeneous sample of cancer patients (n = 57) self-administered a questionnaire containing the QLQ-C30, the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and assessing health and sociodemographic status. Construct validity was assessed by testing a priori hypotheses that QLQ-C30 scales would be moderately or strongly correlated with SF-36 scales measuring similar dimensions of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and that subjects reporting mild symptoms would have better HRQoL scores than those reporting severe symptoms. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbachrsquos agr. Results: Strength of Spearmanrsquos correlations between the QLQ-C30 and SF-36 scales assessing similar dimensions of HRQoL ranged from 0.35 to 0.67. Subjects with mild symptoms had better scores than those with severe symptoms for all six QLQ-C30 HRQoL scales (p < 0.05 for five scales, Mann–Whitney U tests). Cronbachrsquos agr ranged from 0.19 for the cognitive functioning scale to 0.91 for the global QoL scale. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence for the validity and reliability of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in English-speaking Singaporean cancer patients.
Keywords:Cancer  EORTC QLQ-C30  Quality of life  Singapore
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号